...
I won't however defer based on your tired and worn out theme of "well you just don't know biology, so you are wrong" argument (I even suggested when I first proposed this topic that this type of defense be excluded, because its simply not saying a dam thing.., but the admin required me to remove that part of my suggestion-although I knew it wouldn't take long for someone to drag it out).
Your problem is that you do not understand basic biology. You should get a basic biology book and read it (read it for comprehension). You have simply waved away all of the pertinent discussion above and made uninformed discussion about new topics. I will remind you that you yourself have made this topic about natural selection and whether or not it has been verified.
This is JUST ONE of the MANY problems the ToE has to address before it should expect thinking people to all just accept it as a reasonable explanation in my opinion. Especially, since it seems as you all are showing, that we really can't test this. Don't just say its nonsense..spend time thinking about it.
Where are you going in this post? Your topic is about natural selection stay on it, review the material that has been presented to you and come back with informed purposeful meaningful questions about the material. If you think you're coming here to preach and tell us about how Darwin was wrong then you sir are an imbecile of the highest magnitude.