sleveque, I'm going to post the same request I did with Buzsaw. Post quotes directly from the emails themselves and we can discuss from there. You can quote faux news' opinions all you want in a gay-hating evangelical baptist church all you want. I don't think it's too much to ask to look directly at the sources of the so-called controversy.
Ok, WTF this is not only irrelevant (the gay-hating part) but totally absurd and insulting. And Seriously, I'm surprised admins didn't react. This is retarded lol
Anyhow, all I was saying was that it was absurd to come in this thread with the results from the GIEC, precisely when the very controversy is with the reliability of such data.
It was like:
- Look these emails supposedly show that the results were modified to show anthropogenic global wraming
- But no look, the data that they published show anthropogenic global warming ....
- Facepalm*
Anyhow, I'm skeptic about the GIEC resuls for one specific reason:
greenhouse gas who has the biggest effect right now is water vapor. But it is so complicated to simulate in models that we aren't able to do it yet, and so the biggest factor wasn't even taken into account by the GIEC. Yet they published that there was a 90% probability that anthropogenic factors were responsible.
This should ring an alarm bell for everyone, the biggest factor isn't taken into account, and yet they post a 90% figure ? I'm maybe the one not understanding, but something like this certainly ring a bell ...
PS Anyhow, back to the subjects. I've downloaded those emails to check through them.