Bolder writes:
Yes, it is an empirical fact that they are viewed differently, even though logic should tell us they are the same.
Maybe. Maybe not. Depends on what you are calling "logical".
Bolder writes:
And to frogs and to aardvarks they are the same.
Is that true? Do frogs and Aardvarks not treat other frogs and aardvarks any differently to the way they treat rocks? Really? are you sure? Are frogs and aardvarks being "illogical" in not treating other members of their species as they do rocks?
Bolder writes:
So do you believe that this genetic accident, presumably to a hyena, or to a capuchin or something, would have carried a significant survival advantage for the Morality Eve who was so fortunate to get this mutative mindbend amongst their immoral hyena or monkey brothers and sisters?
Do you think it is "logical" for a parent to care for it's young? Should animals just treat their progeny as they would rocks? Would that be "logical"?
I think your logic is missing a rather important component. Reality.
Edited by Straggler, : No reason given.