Peg writes:
however, we were specifically refering to the crossbreeding of lions and domestic cats
You were saying in general terms that Genesis distinguishes wild and domestic animals as different kinds. I was simply showing how, by your definition, wild and domestic animals really aren't different "kinds". In fact, most domestic animals are quite capable of breeding with their wild relatives.
Peg writes:
can it be stated with certainty that 'wild cats' were not from domestic cats that have become feral?
Indeed, not in every case. Some breeds of wild cat might indeed have been domesticated at some point in time. However, most wild cats are very timid and avoid humans. They also have the characteristics of wild animals, like camoflauge, while many domestic cats would stick out like a sore thumb out in the wild.
Wild cats and domestic cats are similar to dogs and wolves. In both cases, domestic and wild could both be said to be the same species.
I'm curious as to why you're making a distinction between wild and domestic, as two different kinds. Many wild animals that are rarely ever considered domesticable have been successfully domesticated. Like
foxes
Many domestic animals also have wild counterparts, like the aforementioned cats and dogs. But also goats, cattle etc.
Since domestication of new species goes on to this day, one can hardly divide animals into two defined groups based on this criteria.
Respectfully,
-Meldinoor
™ Version 4.2
