Transitional Fossils Show Evolution in Process

Hi RAZDVery nice presentation refuting this ridiculous claim (amongst others): This claim ignores the rarity of conditions that allow fossilization to occur. It also ignores micropaleontology, the study of microscopic fossils. Finally, it does nothing to explain the fossils we do find, seeming to take an "all-or-nothing" attitude towards this evidence that would have needed to survive for billions of years.In my opinion, the absence of fossils is one of the weakest of creationists' arguments, easily refuted as demonstrated by your comments above.Thanks for the thread RAZD.Edited by Briterican, : No reason given.

Hi sailorstride Gravity is a theory, but I doubt you'd be willing to test its validity by stepping off a sheer cliff top. You accept it because evidence demonstrates it to be accurate. Evidence can also be used to demonstrate evolutionary theory. No such evidence exists for "creational theories", and I challenge you to present some if you disagree.(Now, after having posted, I'll read the other replies. Next time I'll try to do that first.)Edited by Briterican, : No reason given.Edited by Briterican, : No reason to be nasty.