Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8936 total)
31 online now:
dwise1, GDR, jar, RAZD, ringo, Tangle (6 members, 25 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: ssope
Post Volume: Total: 861,614 Year: 16,650/19,786 Month: 775/2,598 Week: 21/251 Day: 21/23 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Landmark gay marriage trial starts today in California
ramoss
Member
Posts: 3119
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 227 of 759 (652029)
02-11-2012 8:22 PM
Reply to: Message 226 by subbie
02-10-2012 3:26 PM


She said she wouldn't wax eloquent.

What can I say.. typical Republican.. she lied.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 226 by subbie, posted 02-10-2012 3:26 PM subbie has acknowledged this reply

  
ramoss
Member
Posts: 3119
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 317 of 759 (654116)
02-26-2012 11:13 PM
Reply to: Message 316 by hooah212002
02-26-2012 10:43 PM


Re: I don't want you voting on my rights either.

Oh right. I forgot about the republican primary that is championing for women's freedom.

And you must not forget, trans vaginal ultrasounds


This message is a reply to:
 Message 316 by hooah212002, posted 02-26-2012 10:43 PM hooah212002 has acknowledged this reply

  
ramoss
Member
Posts: 3119
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 383 of 759 (701987)
06-28-2013 2:55 PM
Reply to: Message 372 by Stile
06-28-2013 12:28 PM


Re: Supreme Court punts
That was the wrong case. That one was the DOMA case, where because the feds did not see her marriage as 'legal', she had to pay an extra 383K in inheritance tax when her partner passed. ... and they were legally married in NYS.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 372 by Stile, posted 06-28-2013 12:28 PM Stile has acknowledged this reply

  
ramoss
Member
Posts: 3119
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 635 of 759 (717092)
01-24-2014 9:09 AM
Reply to: Message 634 by AZPaul3
01-23-2014 8:05 PM


Re: VA AG - BAM!!
Just to point out.. Loving v. Virginia was the case that overturned the restriction on interracial marriage.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 634 by AZPaul3, posted 01-23-2014 8:05 PM AZPaul3 has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 636 by Theodoric, posted 01-24-2014 9:51 AM ramoss has not yet responded

  
ramoss
Member
Posts: 3119
Joined: 08-11-2004


Message 665 of 759 (760944)
06-26-2015 4:45 PM
Reply to: Message 662 by Faith
06-26-2015 4:26 PM


So, where does it say in the Bible that you have to be a raging hateful bigot?

And where is Christianity being 'criminalized'?

Edited by ramoss, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 662 by Faith, posted 06-26-2015 4:26 PM Faith has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 667 by Faith, posted 06-26-2015 4:50 PM ramoss has responded

  
ramoss
Member
Posts: 3119
Joined: 08-11-2004


(6)
Message 695 of 759 (761178)
06-29-2015 11:41 AM
Reply to: Message 667 by Faith
06-26-2015 4:50 PM


I call them like I see them. Frankly, the conservative fundamentalist Christian does not follow the bible or Jesus, but follows hate instead, and cherry picks from the bible to justify their bigotry
This message is a reply to:
 Message 667 by Faith, posted 06-26-2015 4:50 PM Faith has not yet responded

  
ramoss
Member
Posts: 3119
Joined: 08-11-2004


(1)
Message 721 of 759 (768776)
09-13-2015 10:29 PM
Reply to: Message 708 by Faith
09-13-2015 7:49 AM


Re: Redefining Marriage
I don't see how. How does a gay person getting married effect your marriage?

Edited by ramoss, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 708 by Faith, posted 09-13-2015 7:49 AM Faith has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 723 by Rrhain, posted 09-14-2015 12:17 AM ramoss has not yet responded
 Message 757 by saab93f, posted 09-17-2015 7:11 AM ramoss has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019