and by the time of Jesus it involved a protracted period of engagement that was already called marriage, an unconsummated betrothal which was the state of Joseph and Mary when the angel announced that she was to bear the Messiah.
Evidence please.
but the bottom line was always a man and a woman who decided to make their lives together.
Bullshit. Rarely did they have any choice, especially the woman.
The Christian objection to the SCOTUS ruling has nothing to do with the history of marriage as such, but to its redefinition from the ancient understanding that it unites a man and a woman,
Homosexual unions are known and accepted as normal throughout eastern and western history.
Couple resources.
History of same-sex unions - WikipediaFactRetriever | Interesting Facts for the Curious Mind
It would have been nice if the SCOTUS had made an effort to protect Christians from this situation while extending marriage benefits to gays
Protect christians from what?
Six reasons why the Bible is not against gays
Edited by Theodoric, : No reason given.
Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts
"God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness.