Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,742 Year: 3,999/9,624 Month: 870/974 Week: 197/286 Day: 4/109 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Side Orders ⇒ Coffee House ⇒

Quick Questions, Short Answers - No Debate

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Quick Questions, Short Answers - No Debate
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 116 of 341 (633223)
09-13-2011 7:16 AM 		Reply to: Message 111 by Dr Adequate
09-13-2011 12:55 AM

Re: So ...
What time is it at the North Pole?
​
The same time.
​
Edited by Larni, : No reason given.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Dr Adequate, posted 09-13-2011 12:55 AM Dr Adequate has not replied
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 136 of 341 (637049)
10-13-2011 5:35 AM 		Reply to: Message 133 by Taz
10-13-2011 1:19 AM

Re: Alcohol and sex?
Alcohol is a depressant and this makes it harder to stay errect, finish the job like a professional or even be bothered to try to 'get some' in the first place.
​
Some people turn nasty, some get maudlin, some become party animals. It just depends on what we are like with our frontal cortex dialled down; when we have no inhibitions.
​
You're lucky, I know of a few people who turn into total twats when drunk.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
​
Moreover that view is a blatantly anti-relativistic one. I'm rather inclined to think that space being relative to time and time relative to location should make such a naive hankering to pin-point an ultimate origin of anything, an aspiration that is not even wrong.
​
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by Taz, posted 10-13-2011 1:19 AM Taz has not replied
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 179 of 341 (649232)
01-21-2012 4:15 PM

What to do?
So, my wife is on a night shift so I can put in some Xbox time but, what should I play?
​
I've narrowed it down to Ultimate MvC 3 or Dark Souls.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
​
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
​
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
Replies to this message:
 Message 180 by Theodoric, posted 01-21-2012 4:20 PM Larni has replied
 Message 186 by hooah212002, posted 01-21-2012 8:09 PM Larni has not replied
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 181 of 341 (649236)
01-21-2012 4:23 PM 		Reply to: Message 180 by Theodoric
01-21-2012 4:20 PM

Re: What to do?
That could be doable. I've had it a while but not really played very much of it.
​
Now my choice is even harder.
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
​
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
​
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by Theodoric, posted 01-21-2012 4:20 PM Theodoric has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 182 by crashfrog, posted 01-21-2012 4:46 PM Larni has replied
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 183 of 341 (649239)
01-21-2012 4:59 PM 		Reply to: Message 182 by crashfrog
01-21-2012 4:46 PM

Re: What to do?
Skyrim it is!
The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
​
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
​
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134
This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by crashfrog, posted 01-21-2012 4:46 PM crashfrog has not replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 184 by Panda, posted 01-21-2012 6:54 PM Larni has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024