Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 79 (8960 total)
369 online now:
DrJones*, dwise1, frako, jar, JonF, PaulK, Percy (Admin), RAZD, Tangle, xongsmith (10 members, 359 visitors)
Newest Member: Mikee
Post Volume: Total: 869,568 Year: 1,316/23,288 Month: 1,316/1,851 Week: 440/320 Day: 49/91 Hour: 2/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Size of the universe
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 56 of 248 (598263)
12-29-2010 7:39 PM
Reply to: Message 7 by cavediver
09-25-2010 10:15 AM


Re: WOW!!!
Cavediver writes:

quite typical actually - we find that in 97.2% of universes, their observable size doesn't coincide with their age. Strange, but true...

With all due respect, the multi-verse theory (imo hypothesis, if that) as well as BB theory assumes some ambiguous priories no more plausible than some SM incompatible creationist priories.

Reality gets swept under the mathematical rug.


BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
Time Relates To What Is Temperal. What Is Eternal Is Timeless.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by cavediver, posted 09-25-2010 10:15 AM cavediver has not yet responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by DrJones*, posted 12-29-2010 8:34 PM Buzsaw has responded

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 58 of 248 (598268)
12-29-2010 9:31 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by DrJones*
12-29-2010 8:34 PM


Re: Which Life Priory Most Probable?
Dr Jones writes:

Please explain how the math is flawed, show your work.

There comes a time when the math and reality become incompatible beyond imagination. There comes a time when the math goes beyond the probability of the Buzsaw hypothesis which is more realistically compatible with the basic (abe: I say basic and fundamental) observable laws of science and probability theory.

The definition of life rests on one or the other. Imo probability favors the Buzsaw priory of life and the Universe.

ABE: Perhaps it would be helpful cite one plausible probability theory. In the Bayesian Probability Theory, there are two views; the subjective and the objective.

Objective and subjective Bayesian probabilitiesBroadly speaking, there are two views on Bayesian probability that interpret the 'state of knowledge' concept in different ways. For objectivists, the rules of Bayesian statistics can be justified by requirements of rationality and consistency.

Edited by Buzsaw, : as showin in context

Edited by Buzsaw, : No reason given.


BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
Time Relates To What Is Temperal. What Is Eternal Is Timeless.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by DrJones*, posted 12-29-2010 8:34 PM DrJones* has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by DrJones*, posted 12-29-2010 9:38 PM Buzsaw has responded

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 61 of 248 (598278)
12-29-2010 10:18 PM
Reply to: Message 59 by DrJones*
12-29-2010 9:38 PM


Re: Which Life Priory Most Probable?
Dr Jones, note the ABE which I added to my message.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by DrJones*, posted 12-29-2010 9:38 PM DrJones* has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by DrJones*, posted 12-29-2010 10:21 PM Buzsaw has responded

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 63 of 248 (598281)
12-29-2010 10:50 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by DrJones*
12-29-2010 10:21 PM


Re: Which Life Priory Most Probable?
Dr jones writes:

What does that have to do with your claim that the math is incompatible with reality and my request that you show how the math is wrong?

I was merely evaluating the priori and the conclusions of the math relative to which life meaning priory and conclusion is the more plausible one realistically.

Methinks Admin Moose is already getting antsy about topic. It's time to move on.


BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW.
The Immeasurable Present Eternally Extends the Infinite Past And Infinitely Consumes The Eternal Future.
Time Relates To What Is Temperal. What Is Eternal Is Timeless.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by DrJones*, posted 12-29-2010 10:21 PM DrJones* has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by DrJones*, posted 12-29-2010 10:55 PM Buzsaw has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020