Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,415 Year: 3,672/9,624 Month: 543/974 Week: 156/276 Day: 30/23 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Bin Laden and Al Gore are now two peas in a pod
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 3 of 138 (545025)
01-31-2010 12:32 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by John 10:10
01-30-2010 10:56 PM


Yes Of Course
Yes, Osama Bin Laden murdered thousands of American citizens in a vile act of terrorism.
Whereas Al Gore is just like him because ...
... oh, wait, he didn't.
The sheer extent of human stupidity depresses me so much. Please stop.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by John 10:10, posted 01-30-2010 10:56 PM John 10:10 has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 6 of 138 (545031)
01-31-2010 5:14 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Son
01-31-2010 4:42 AM


What is this? An april joke or something? Shouldn't it go to the humor thread?
It is funny, I guess. Except that people like John 10:10 take it seriously.
We must always remember that Obama has a foreign sounding name and is not white. You can't argue with that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Son, posted 01-31-2010 4:42 AM Son has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 14 of 138 (545337)
02-03-2010 7:53 AM
Reply to: Message 7 by John 10:10
01-31-2010 10:27 AM


Re: PS - Maybe now some will understand what 911 was all about!
Bin Laden and Al Gore are now two peas in a pod because Bin Laden has jumped on the "man-caused" global warming band wagon.
Oh, it's much worse than that.
President Obama and Hitler are now "two peas in a pod" because Obama has jumped on the "2 + 2 = 4" bandwagon. Sickening though it is, Obama actually believes that children should be indoctrinated into believing that 2 + 2 = 4 --- just like Hitler.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 7 by John 10:10, posted 01-31-2010 10:27 AM John 10:10 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 15 by Huntard, posted 02-03-2010 8:17 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 25 of 138 (545709)
02-04-2010 10:12 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by xongsmith
02-04-2010 2:54 PM


Re: PS - Maybe now some will understand what 911 was all about!
Actually, I have it on special authority that Stalin believed that 2 + 2 = 3.999... instead of 4.
Now I understand what 910.999... was all about.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by xongsmith, posted 02-04-2010 2:54 PM xongsmith has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 41 of 138 (545889)
02-05-2010 11:07 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by Buzsaw
02-05-2010 9:01 PM


Battle Born
As for global warming, perhaps we could use a little these days here in the Americas.
That depends on whether "the Americas" includes Nevada. You think, maybe, that as the ground temperature only gets up to 201 F on our best days, we need a little help? Just a little more and we could throw away our kettles and boil our water for free on the desert sand. Hurrah!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Buzsaw, posted 02-05-2010 9:01 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 61 of 138 (545976)
02-06-2010 9:55 PM
Reply to: Message 58 by Buzsaw
02-06-2010 7:01 PM


Re: We Could Do Fine Alone, Thank You.
So a private US company is going to invest money in a venture that seems likely to return enormous profits.
Well ... I guess that that's a bad thing, but I can't quite figure out why. Please explain to me why capitalism is bad and why Americans shouldn't profit from it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Buzsaw, posted 02-06-2010 7:01 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by subbie, posted 02-06-2010 11:00 PM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 62 of 138 (545977)
02-06-2010 10:02 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Buzsaw
02-06-2010 8:11 AM


Re: Responses Obfuscating My Position
If the planet survived the ice age, perhaps Ms Coral and other oxygen lubbing life will be so invigerated by all of the plant expelled oxygen that adaptation to the heat will not be a problem. Then too, who knows the Nevada desert may turn into a cactus or tropical jungle where there's lots of shade and water.
Further, perhaps the heat will make the atmosphere less dense as it warms and rises further into space such as it likely was before the flood, forming a nice greenhouse canopy over the planet, diming the sun a bit and moderating the planet's temps so that man can live hundreds of years as it was before the flood.
ABE: .........And as is implied in the Biblical prophecies relative to the emerging messianic millenium, requiring rather sudden climate change effected by global warming, now in the early stages of ever escalating climate change. The change will be rough, being the wrath of God time, so brace yourselves, ye yunguns, ole man Buz's Biblically inspired hypothesis will be vindicated and you'll see it!!
So ...
According to your political views, climate change is just fine and everything's going to be absolutely peachy.
And according to your religious views, climate change is going to wreak disaster on us all as an aspect of Armageddon.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Buzsaw, posted 02-06-2010 8:11 AM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by Buzsaw, posted 02-06-2010 10:36 PM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 68 of 138 (545986)
02-07-2010 12:24 AM
Reply to: Message 63 by Buzsaw
02-06-2010 10:36 PM


Re: Climate Change
Hi Doc. No. As a matter of fact it will get very destructive in order to effect the ultimate peachy stage as per a literal reading of scripture.
So, let's try to get this straight. According to you climate change will be absolutely horrible. We shouldn't listen to the conservative version of Buzsaw, who tells us that climate change is all going to work out just fine, and that climate change might perfectly well turn Nevada into a lush tropical paradise. No, we shouldn't listen to the conservative Buzsaw. Instead we should listen listen to the Christian version of Buzsaw, who tells us that climate change is going to be "very destructive".
I'm just trying to sort this out. You seem to have two totally conflicting sets of opinions. You seem, indeed, to be two totally different people. According to the conservative Buzsaw, climate change is just fine and dandy. But according to the Christian Buzsaw, climate change is a "very destructive" thing that's part of the wrath of God and a sign of the approaching millenium.
But you're the same person. The conservative Buzsaw and the Christian Buzsaw are the same person. There is only one Buzsaw. So when you have finished arguing with yourself, what does the one, the one, the one and only Buzsaw really believe about climate change?
Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by Buzsaw, posted 02-06-2010 10:36 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by Meldinoor, posted 02-07-2010 12:39 AM Dr Adequate has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 103 of 138 (566093)
06-23-2010 1:49 AM
Reply to: Message 100 by John 10:10
06-22-2010 3:11 PM


Re: Perhaps, but maybe not!
No, I meant "special rights." There are sufficient laws on our books that give gays equal rights. All that's needed is for these laws to be fairly/effectively enforced.
So ... gay people already have the right to marry, but the judicial branch is ignoring this?
Can you show me the law?
Also, if they already have these equal rights of which you speak, then for the legislature to pass a law specifically saying so would not endow them with "special rights", just remind those indolent or corrupt judges of the rights that gay people already have.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by John 10:10, posted 06-22-2010 3:11 PM John 10:10 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 106 by John 10:10, posted 06-23-2010 2:58 PM Dr Adequate has replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 104 of 138 (566095)
06-23-2010 1:52 AM
Reply to: Message 102 by John 10:10
06-22-2010 6:41 PM


Re: Perhaps, but maybe not!
John 10:10, message #102 writes:
In free societies, the gay marriage issue is determined by the constitutional laws of the land or state.
John 10:10, message #100 writes:
There are sufficient laws on our books that give gays equal rights. All that's needed is for these laws to be fairly/effectively enforced.
Discuss.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by John 10:10, posted 06-22-2010 6:41 PM John 10:10 has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 115 of 138 (566275)
06-23-2010 11:23 PM
Reply to: Message 113 by John 10:10
06-23-2010 5:23 PM


Re: Two peas in a pod
If terrorists and fundamentalist Muslims want to crusade against homosexuality being God's truth, I'm all for that.
Then according to your own fucking stupid reasoning, you and Bin Laden are now "two peas in a pod". Because you share one opinion with him, you are basically responsible for 9/11.
And because you agree with Hitler that 2 + 2 = 4, you're "like two peas in a pod" with him.
Are you going to apologize for the Holocaust? I mean, we've established that people like you are to blame.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by John 10:10, posted 06-23-2010 5:23 PM John 10:10 has not replied

  
Dr Adequate
Member (Idle past 305 days)
Posts: 16113
Joined: 07-20-2006


Message 116 of 138 (566278)
06-24-2010 12:08 AM
Reply to: Message 106 by John 10:10
06-23-2010 2:58 PM


Re: Perhaps, but maybe not!
Gays have the right to marry when they are given that right under state laws.
And that's what gives them "equal rights", whereas when they campaign to be given that right they are asking for "special rights"?
Now, as readers of these forums will know, I do enjoy mocking idiots. But John 10:10 has left me with nothing more to do. I can quote him and give the context, and I can really think of nothing further that I could say that would make his position seem more absurd than it already is.
To guard a title that was rich before,
To gild refined gold, to paint the lily,
To throw a perfume on the violet,
To smooth the ice, or add another hue
Unto the rainbow, or with taper-light
To seek the beauteous eye of heaven to garnish,
Is wasteful and ridiculous excess.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 106 by John 10:10, posted 06-23-2010 2:58 PM John 10:10 has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024