Bin Laden and Al Gore are now two peas in a pod

Hi Buz, Because this is the sort of mockery that J10:10's idiotic screed deserves. He doesn't have any pertinent points, so there is nothing to hijack. He is actually suggesting that Gore and bin Laden are "two peas in a pod" because they both believe in global warming. You don't get to say something as stupid as that without being ridiculed.The thread isn't good for anything other than sport. Unless you really want to defend J10:10's moronic OP? Really? Really Buz?Mutate and Survive

I have no idea what made you think that. No, I'm afraid that's beyond me. Perhaps you would like to help me out. Is it not obvious? It's already been made clear in post after post. J10:10 is claiming that because he has found one similarity between Gore and bin Laden, they are essentially the same. That is moronic and offensive. The logical fallacy is so vast it can be seen from space.The OP is so pathetically vapid that the only mature and appropriate response is to point and laugh or perhaps to hold John 10:10 up as a cautionary example of what happens when one is foolish enough to replace basic logic with hateful dogma. Pointing out that a stupid argument is stupid is not condescension. It is also worth pointing out that J10:10 is consistently one of the rudest and most condescending posters here, with most of his messages consisting of little more than trite Bible verses and threats of divine judgement. He can hardly be bothered to defend his own thread. he doesn't deserve your sympathy. Right. Just like Al Gore... didn't...J10:10 is being absurd and offensive in comparing Gore to bin Laden. If he gets a taste of his own medicine, it is well deserved.Of course, if you think it unfair to compare J10:10 to bin Laden, then you must also accept that it is equally offensive to compare Gore to bin Laden, no?Mutate and Survive

Hi John 10:10Er... I don't know how up to speed you are with current events, but...Al Gore lost that election.Yup. I'm pretty sure we're safe from him. Sorry to spoil your little apocalyptic fantasy. Of course you don't. You simply;1) say something idiotic.
2) Wait for everyone to call you an idiot.
3) Sit back and bask in smug self-satisfaction. After all, you've just proved your critics to be big mean meanies, so you must be right.Sad.Mutate and Survive

I assume that the irony of the following is lost on you; Says the man who seems to think that a good way to attack climate science is to compare Al Gore to Osama bin Laden. Which gives him the power to do... nothing. The Nobel peace prize is indeed a joke, which rather underlines its irrelevance here. So when Hitler supposedly fights for the Bible and Christianity, as he indeed claimed, that makes you and him "peas in a pod"?Your attempt at an argument is pathetic.Mutate and Survive

Buz, try and keep up.I am claiming that John10:10 and Hitler are not alike.J10:10 is claiming that because Gore claims a belief in global warming and bin Laden claims a belief in global warming that they are "two peas in a pod".I am claiming that despite the fact that Hitler claimed to be a Christian and John10:10 claims to be a Christian, they are not "two peas in a pod" and that such arguments are blatantly fallacious hogwash.I am trying to highlight the flaws in J10:10's "argument". Okay?Mutate and Survive