Hyroglyphx writes:
And because it has become so politicised, I can't trust anyone just yet.
As I see it, it's only politicised for the same reason that evolution is "controversial."
Evidence overwhelmingly supports the reality of anthropogenic climate change. The "controversy" is generated by those with a vested interest in the current petroleum-based economy, and is eaten up by right-wing dupes who like to assert the sort of nonsense that j10:10 spewed out in the OP.
I also suspect that there's a nice big helping of just plain meanness motivating the deniers, case in point being ANWR. Oil producers know that, compared to current need, there's only a negligible amount of oil to be had there in one of the very last few untrampled places on Earth. They just want to "drill, baby, drill" as a way of saying FUCK YOU to the people who actually care about this planet.
If you want to know where the truth is, follow the money - explain to me again how the hippies are going to become socialist billionaires by redistributing all the Christian SUV owners' hard-earned money to third world Muslim abortionists? - and pay attention to who's lying. Who do you really think has been lying?
I have no time for lies and fantasy, and neither should you. Enjoy or die.
-John Lydon
™ Version 4.2