Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,423 Year: 3,680/9,624 Month: 551/974 Week: 164/276 Day: 4/34 Hour: 0/1


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Biological Evolution ⇒

Why creationist definitions of evolution are wrong, terribly wrong.

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why creationist definitions of evolution are wrong, terribly wrong.
ZenMonkey
Member (Idle past 4532 days)
Posts: 428
From: Portland, OR USA
Joined: 09-25-2009

Normal Thread Display
Message 39 of 205 (546068)
02-08-2010 2:47 AM 		Reply to: Message 20 by Taz
02-06-2010 11:53 AM

Re: why use a wrong definition?
Taz writes:
​
ICANT writes:
​
"Micro"evolution is a fact.
​
"Macro"evolution is an assumption.
​
It was not observed and no experiment can be run to reproduce the claimed results. Thus there is no empirical evidence.
​
Then give us the definition of these words and we'll go from there.
​
Don't go there. We went to 425 posts in the Species/Kinds (for Peg...and others) thread and ICANT never did come upwith a real definition of "kind." I anticipate a similar degree of success in getting him to explain what he really means by micro- and macroevolution.
​
I have no time for lies and fantasy, and neither should you. Enjoy or die.
-John Lydon
This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Taz, posted 02-06-2010 11:53 AM Taz has not replied
  
ZenMonkey
Member (Idle past 4532 days)
Posts: 428
From: Portland, OR USA
Joined: 09-25-2009

Normal Thread Display
Message 48 of 205 (546167)
02-09-2010 1:22 AM 		Reply to: Message 47 by Taz
02-09-2010 1:14 AM

Re: why use ANY wrong definition?
Taz writes:
​
I see you've fallen back to defending a ridiculous position.
​
Don't forget also claiming that his question hadn't been answered when he didn't get the anwer he wanted. And then running away.
​
I have no time for lies and fantasy, and neither should you. Enjoy or die.
-John Lydon
This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Taz, posted 02-09-2010 1:14 AM Taz has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024