Hmmm...this site is complete and utter crud....
http://www.basham5.org/creation.htm
1)"The 2 worldviews:
a)Humanist, who says Man is God
b)Creationist, who says God is God."
umm.... shouldnt that be there is no God for humanist?
2)"First Law of Thermodynamics, the Law of Conservation of Energy
c)No matter is created; all is conserved. You can neither create nor destroy matter.
d)Evolutionists say that 18-20 billions of years ago, all matter was condensed into a area no smaller than a period on this page (from Scientific American). It began to spin faster and faster, until it exploded, spewing out all matter into what has become our Universe. In fact, some speculate it came from nothing. Nothing produced something."
So matter cant be produced or destroyed huh? Thats not the case the energy generated by nuclear reactions can be calculated using the mass defect (starting mass - end mass) and the equation E = mc^2....
3)"Conservation of Angular Momentum
a)If an object is spinning, anything part of that object which leaves it will continue spinning in the same direction as the object.
b)If the Universe was created from the big bang, all objects resulting from that should be spinning in the same direction.
i)Venus and Uranus are spinning in the opposite direction as the other planets."
umm again no... the total angular momentum must remain constant UNLESS some work is done on the system (contraction under gravity for example)....
4)"The moon is moving away from the earth at a known rate. This means the moon used to be closer. The moon causes the tides on the earth, by its gravitational pull. The closer the moon is to the earth, the higher the tides. If you go back a million years, the moon would have been flooding the earth every day"
Oh so the moon is moving into a higher orbit over time is it one word.... BOLLOCKS.... Gravity exerts a pull as the equation F = GmM/R^2 not a push for the moon to move away from the earth something would need to exert a force on it, that is unless he believes Newton got it wrong.....
Another thing that is lacking in his account is the fact that the gravitational pull of the sun is also a cause of the tides, does he believe that we were that much closer to the sun?
I could continue but I think that its obvious that this fella doesnt know his arse from his elbow.....
so if this is the only reference to Jump theory I think we can safely forget it....
[This message has been edited by joz, 11-27-2001]