Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,783 Year: 4,040/9,624 Month: 911/974 Week: 238/286 Day: 45/109 Hour: 2/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Wingnuts Praying for Obama's Death
Jumped Up Chimpanzee
Member (Idle past 4968 days)
Posts: 572
From: UK
Joined: 10-22-2009


Message 24 of 124 (547192)
02-17-2010 5:17 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by Taz
02-16-2010 11:53 PM


Re: Point?
I have to back you and Hooah up on this.
This is a pattern we see across many branches of religion.
Islam is a great example. Time and again we hear certain Muslim "leaders" proclaiming how we non-Muslims have got it so wrong, that Islam is an entirely peaceful religion. Yet, hold on, why are they telling us that? If they had any moral courage at all they would turn around to the obnoxious bigoted thugs hiding behind them, who carry out their vile acts in the name of Islam, and say the same thing to them.
And then there are the so called "sophisticated Christian theologians" who are far too clever to actually believe in a god, yet they only say that to atheists. They are quite happy for millions and millions of other Christians to live miserable lives of guilt thinking that there really is a man in the sky holding a big stick over their heads. They never have the moral courage to stand up in church and say to the congregation, "For goodness sake, don't worry! There isn't really a man in the sky! You don't really need to fear going to Hell! We're just here for a bit of community spirit." Instead, just by their very presence in church and in the Christian movement in general they help perpetuate real belief amongst those who they obviously consider too stupid to understand the subtleties of their oh-so-sophisticated-theology.
Catholic and protestant communities in Northern Ireland? Hardly made an effort to isolate the "minority" of violent thugs in their midst did they.
Catholic Church and paedophiles. Wow! They really nipped that problem in the bud!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Taz, posted 02-16-2010 11:53 PM Taz has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by hooah212002, posted 02-17-2010 5:23 AM Jumped Up Chimpanzee has replied
 Message 27 by Coragyps, posted 02-17-2010 10:11 AM Jumped Up Chimpanzee has replied

Jumped Up Chimpanzee
Member (Idle past 4968 days)
Posts: 572
From: UK
Joined: 10-22-2009


Message 26 of 124 (547197)
02-17-2010 6:20 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by hooah212002
02-17-2010 5:23 AM


Re: Point?
I was listening to a radio program about a journalist who turned atheist after being a born again. He spoke of a pastor who came clean about molesting children to his congregation. They applauded him for his courage. They then named the church after him.
What a man! What a community!
Makes me think of those who laud Gerry Adams as a hero for peace!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by hooah212002, posted 02-17-2010 5:23 AM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

Jumped Up Chimpanzee
Member (Idle past 4968 days)
Posts: 572
From: UK
Joined: 10-22-2009


(1)
Message 28 of 124 (547218)
02-17-2010 11:05 AM
Reply to: Message 27 by Coragyps
02-17-2010 10:11 AM


Re: Point?
JUC writes:
And then there are the so called "sophisticated Christian theologians" who are far too clever to actually believe in a god...
Coragyps replies:
I don't know, Jumpy. There may be a few masquerading atheists like that, but my bet is that the vast majority of upper-echelon churchmen, no matter how "smart," are also real live believers. It's hard for me to see how that would be from my present atheist perspective, but I used to buy into that belief crap in my younger days, too. And a few people, like my employer, seem to think I'm fairly smart.
You may be right about many bishop types, although I'm inclined to agree with Dan Dennett that many of them don't believe but for various reasons don't want to admit it.
However, I'm really talking about the "intellectual" and "academic" theologians like Karen Armstrong and Terry Eagleton who mock the likes of Dawkins, Hitchens and Dennett for having, in their view, a childish view of religion. Armstrong has said things along the lines that you don't have to have belief to be religious or a Christian. Eagleton has shed great light on the issue by saying "God is what loved the world into being." For another example, check out this link to an article by Be Scofield (no, I'd never heard of him either) criticising Hitchens:
Christopher Hitchens: The Orthodox Protestant Atheist | Tikkun Daily Blog Archive
These theologians are definitely a minority among Christians (if you can call them that), yet they criticise the likes of Dawkins for thinking that religion is about believing in a god, but they never go along to church (as far as I'm aware) and say the same thing to the praying flock. Therefore, what I meant is that they must consider themselves so much smarter than the flock that it's not worth their while breaking the truth to them. I didn't mean to imply that I think the believers and former believers like yourself are stupid. Not all of you, anyway.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Coragyps, posted 02-17-2010 10:11 AM Coragyps has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Coragyps, posted 02-17-2010 2:32 PM Jumped Up Chimpanzee has replied

Jumped Up Chimpanzee
Member (Idle past 4968 days)
Posts: 572
From: UK
Joined: 10-22-2009


Message 30 of 124 (547313)
02-18-2010 4:14 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by Coragyps
02-17-2010 2:32 PM


Re: Point?
"God is what loved the world into being."
I just nominated this for Most Vapid Pronouncement of the Decade.
I'll second that!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Coragyps, posted 02-17-2010 2:32 PM Coragyps has not replied

Jumped Up Chimpanzee
Member (Idle past 4968 days)
Posts: 572
From: UK
Joined: 10-22-2009


Message 31 of 124 (547314)
02-18-2010 4:30 AM
Reply to: Message 29 by Coragyps
02-17-2010 2:32 PM


Re: Point?
I've double-checked the Terry Eagleton article just to make sure I wasn't misquoting. I wasn't word-for-word perfect but effectively it's what he said. Here's the complete paragraph and a link to the article in New Humanist magazine, which, in my view, portrays him as a total waste of space. How on earth did this guy get into Cambridge University? Ah, because he applied to read theology!
Terry Eagleton (in all his glory):
"That's right. Aquinas is saying that the relationship between God and the world is about the fact that the world is in some ways His. Not in the sense that my shoes are mine because I manufactured them but because at the centre of the world lies his love and freedom. God didn't create the world. He loved it into being. Now what that means, God knows, but that's exactly what Aquinas was saying. The concept of God is what will not let you go. He will not let you slip through his fingers. It's that kind of unconditional love. If you like, that's impossible. We can only know conditional love, but if you are to have some kind of authentic idea of God that's the place from which you have to start, not seeing God as some kind of manufacturer."
Tragic hero: Laurie Taylor interviews Terry Eagleton | New Humanist

This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by Coragyps, posted 02-17-2010 2:32 PM Coragyps has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024