You people who continually deny the possibility of the flood consistently fail to factor in the implications of a Biblical pre-flood planet and atmosphere relative to radiometric dating metholody. You are assuming a relative uniformity which necessarily assumes the impossibility of a global flood. Your premise and the Biblical record premise are not one and the same premise in interpreting what we observe.
Well Buz, you have once again demonstrated the catastrophic effects of religion on morality.
You have been repeatedly and very clearly shown that these statements about a world-wide flood of yours are utter balderdash, yet you continue to produce them. How is this not bald-faced lieing, given that you have offered no real support for these statements (ancient myths do not count)?
Further, you have been shown that observation of the real world shows that it is impossible for there to have been a world-wide flood. How is it not lieing to keep saying there was?
™ Version 4.2