Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,781 Year: 4,038/9,624 Month: 909/974 Week: 236/286 Day: 43/109 Hour: 0/5


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   How do scientists explain the cause of the Ice Age(s)?
greyseal
Member (Idle past 3888 days)
Posts: 464
Joined: 08-11-2009


Message 37 of 96 (580281)
09-08-2010 1:03 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by jasonkthompson
02-25-2010 6:15 PM


no, a worldwide flud wouldn't cause an iceage
Hi Jason,
I'm going to go out on a limb here and discuss something I know very little about, but at which I still believe that I am correct.
firstly, I firmly believe that a worldwide flood wouldn't cause an iceage.
It's nothing to do with precipitation, it's everything to do with the colour of water. Water is rather dark, and it absorbs heat very well, as far as I know. Water is also a major, and I mean major, greenhouse gas.
IMHO (and no, I don't have the math to back it up!) if you have water, water everywhere, you're going to get two things:
1) a dark surface covering the planet, which would raise temperatures all over the entire planet, and melt the icecaps to boot
2) lots and lots of water in the air, which would also absorb lots and lots of heat, raising the temperature (and melting icecaps, releasing more water, etc, etc)
with those two facts alone, I am more than certain that IF a worldwide flood had happened, we would not have an iceage.
now, in addition to that, there's two things you need to know
1) the bible doesn't describe an iceage - why wouldn't it?
2) how long do you think an iceage lasts? how long do you think an iceage takes to actually cover a significant portion of the planet, stay that way, and then finally recede?
so that's two certain things against your theory, and the kicker is my pet theory which I would honestly like examined.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by jasonkthompson, posted 02-25-2010 6:15 PM jasonkthompson has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by Coragyps, posted 09-08-2010 3:26 PM greyseal has replied

  
greyseal
Member (Idle past 3888 days)
Posts: 464
Joined: 08-11-2009


Message 39 of 96 (580314)
09-08-2010 4:00 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by Coragyps
09-08-2010 3:26 PM


Re: no, a worldwide flud wouldn't cause an iceage
coragyps writes:
Isaac Newton, a Famous Christian Creationist Scientist, said that "every action has an equal and opposite reaction." So a hot humid Fludde would automatically cause a Cold Freezy Ice Age. So there, Mr Smarty Pants Secularist!!1! [/creationist hat]
your logic...it is irrefutable!!!111oneoneoneleven
It's all so simple now - I renounce my evil ways. I just hope Thor can forgive me for all these years...it's only through his awesome hammer that we don't have to deal with ice trolls, so he's surely the reason we're not in an iceage, right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Coragyps, posted 09-08-2010 3:26 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024