Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,461 Year: 3,718/9,624 Month: 589/974 Week: 202/276 Day: 42/34 Hour: 5/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   WooHoo! More idiots running the gub'ment.
ZenMonkey
Member (Idle past 4532 days)
Posts: 428
From: Portland, OR USA
Joined: 09-25-2009


Message 22 of 245 (548686)
03-01-2010 12:49 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by Coyote
03-01-2010 12:10 AM


Re: Poor Babes
Coyote writes:
Check out the Lemon test. The actions of government must have a secular purpose.
Exactly. I have yet to see someone put forth a convincing arguement supported by evidence and not religious conviction that my preference in the personal plumbing of my partner(s) has anything to do with my ability to drive a bus, say, or teach high school or translate Arabic for the military. Moreover, how is it that it's wrong for someone to beat the crap out of me unless it's because they disapprove of my taste in men and/or women? Then somehow it's okay.
There is no valid rationale for laws that exclude homosexuals from the rights that non-homosexuals enjoy that is not based on religious conviction. And while I agree to an extent with Buz that lawmakers can propose legislation for any reason that enters their befuddled, rodent-like minds, the legislation that they produce can not have a a result that is clearly unconstitutional. They can't legislate religious doctrine. And there's a reason that they're called inalienable rights. That means that they're not up for a vote.
Sorry, Coyote, I ended up going off on Buz and his ilk in a reply to your post. I'm agreeing with you.

I have no time for lies and fantasy, and neither should you. Enjoy or die.
-John Lydon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Coyote, posted 03-01-2010 12:10 AM Coyote has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by hooah212002, posted 03-01-2010 12:55 AM ZenMonkey has replied

  
ZenMonkey
Member (Idle past 4532 days)
Posts: 428
From: Portland, OR USA
Joined: 09-25-2009


Message 24 of 245 (548694)
03-01-2010 1:44 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by hooah212002
03-01-2010 12:55 AM


Re: Poor Babes
Right. Insofar as they base their fucked-up legislation on fucked-up beliefs, then yes, the results will be ... you guessed it ... pretty fucked-up.

I have no time for lies and fantasy, and neither should you. Enjoy or die.
-John Lydon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by hooah212002, posted 03-01-2010 12:55 AM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
ZenMonkey
Member (Idle past 4532 days)
Posts: 428
From: Portland, OR USA
Joined: 09-25-2009


Message 46 of 245 (548816)
03-01-2010 11:57 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by Buzsaw
03-01-2010 11:40 PM


Re: Communist Religious Persecution
Here's a quick quiz.
Which sounds more like a rallying cry for persecution, pogroms and purges:
1. "God wills it!"
2. "I see no convincing emperical evidence at this time to support the existence of a personal god."
Take your time.

I have no time for lies and fantasy, and neither should you. Enjoy or die.
-John Lydon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by Buzsaw, posted 03-01-2010 11:40 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
ZenMonkey
Member (Idle past 4532 days)
Posts: 428
From: Portland, OR USA
Joined: 09-25-2009


(1)
Message 53 of 245 (548824)
03-02-2010 12:22 AM
Reply to: Message 48 by Buzsaw
03-01-2010 11:57 PM


Re: Communist Religious Persecution
Buzsaw writes:
Because just as the elected reps support a secular position, elected reps should be equally allowed to support a religious position without you people crying foul.
How odd. I thought that I was living in a country in which it was virtually impossible to get elected to national office without many, many protestations of one's belief in God, almost always the Christian God. I was under the impression that I lived in a country in which half the voters say that they would never vote for an "otherwise qualified" atheist candidate for president, making even a homosexual more likely to get elected. (And we know how likely that is.) I had no idea that all this religiosity amongst elected officials meant the government was a vast atheistic conspiracy, determined to stamp out Christianity entirely from public life.
How could I have been so mistaken?

I have no time for lies and fantasy, and neither should you. Enjoy or die.
-John Lydon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Buzsaw, posted 03-01-2010 11:57 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by Buzsaw, posted 03-02-2010 12:35 AM ZenMonkey has not replied

  
ZenMonkey
Member (Idle past 4532 days)
Posts: 428
From: Portland, OR USA
Joined: 09-25-2009


(1)
Message 54 of 245 (548825)
03-02-2010 12:24 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by Buzsaw
03-02-2010 12:15 AM


Re: Communist Religious Persecution
To take a quote from Buffy the Vampire Slayer Season 8 that would appear to apply:
"You're talking crazy talk! Put words in word places!"

I have no time for lies and fantasy, and neither should you. Enjoy or die.
-John Lydon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Buzsaw, posted 03-02-2010 12:15 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
ZenMonkey
Member (Idle past 4532 days)
Posts: 428
From: Portland, OR USA
Joined: 09-25-2009


Message 113 of 245 (548934)
03-02-2010 3:44 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by Buzsaw
03-02-2010 8:36 AM


Re: What Use To Be
Buzsaw writes:
LOL, Coyote. The school kiddies, in America's past, were exposed to a whole lot more Bible for a long time than what they are today, embracing Biblical beliefs. Those were the days of America's incline. These are the days of America's decline.
You're making up made up things.
I'm late jumping on this one, but by what standard do you judge that America is in some state of decline? Life expectencancy? Percentage of the population living in poverty? Crime? Access to technology? Literacy? Or is this just some made up shit that Christian fundies like to make up?
And if atheism leads to lawless, sinful behavior, then I suppose that means that the National Academy of Sciences must be a frantic monkeyhouse of depravity, crime and wickedness, since 93% of its members are non-believers. Where are the pictures of the orgies and baby sacrifices at their annual meetings?
It appears from many of your posts, Buz, that you buy into the fundie belief that somehow or other a society that isn't explicity dominated by Christians somehow equates to a society in which Christians are being persecuted. Thanks. This makes me laugh. Please try to understand the notion that equal rights for all doesn't mean that your rights are being infringed.
Edited by ZenMonkey, : Added rhetorical flourish.

I have no time for lies and fantasy, and neither should you. Enjoy or die.
-John Lydon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by Buzsaw, posted 03-02-2010 8:36 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
ZenMonkey
Member (Idle past 4532 days)
Posts: 428
From: Portland, OR USA
Joined: 09-25-2009


(1)
Message 156 of 245 (549617)
03-09-2010 9:57 AM
Reply to: Message 151 by Buzsaw
03-08-2010 11:04 PM


Re: Athiestic Values
Buzsaw writes:
I thank God that I am not an athiest, primarily because I believe I will be held accountable forever relative to sin, righteousness and judgement and the need to have a savior/advocate/redeemer so as to be able to stand before Jehovah and his christ/messiah Jesus who is Biblically depicted as lord/master of all humans.
Buz, I'm sure you've grown tired of hearing this, but it's true: this is purely circular reasoning.
What you're really saying here is that you're grateful to be a Christian because you're a Christian. Christianity is valuable to you because you're judging it by values that are strictly Christian. It's like a Muslim saying that he's glad the he's a Muslim because Allah is the one true god. Well, he wouldn't say that Allah is the one true god unless he were a Muslim in the first place, would he? Do you get it? It's like saying that the Miami Dolphins are a better team than the New York Yankees because they score a lot more touchdowns.*
By the way, you haven't actually told us what your Christian values are. Can you name any values you hold that an atheist could not, other than those that simply establish that you are, in fact, a Christian, but have no meaning outside of that? Can you name any moral value that you hold - such as showing forgiveness to others, respecting one's elders, not killing people whenever you feel like it - that an atheist could not?
Having a relationship with Christ isn't a value, it's simply a belief. It's a belief that can encourage the cultivation of certain values, but it's not a value in itself. I hope that you can see the distinction.
Buzsaw writes:
The reason I thank God that I am not an athiest has nothing to do with whether atheists are what I consider moral or immoral. I have a number of athiest friends and people I interact with who are, in fact better people than some professing Christians who I know. Imo, it is not necessarily athiestic values which made these good folks moral. It likely had a lot to do with their up-bringng and enironment, education, etc, none of which are athestic values perse.
Ah yes, there you go. You already made your point for me.
For the record, Buz, I actually respect you quite a bit. I apologize for times when I've been disrespectful in my replies to you. It's difficult to reason with you, and I sometimes doubt your intellectual honesty, but I've never seen you speak to anyone out of malice here and I suspect that you're a decent human being in real life. It would be gratifying if you saw someday that the inner truth you feel of your connection to God shouldn't be threatened by the truth of the physical world around you that you sometimes so stubbornly deny. If your God is real and he's good, then you shouldn't have to think that this universe is other than what science reveals it to be. God wouldn't lie to you, would he?
By the way, it's a-theist, not a-thiest. As in, no theos. No God. That's all.
*For you foreign folk, that's American football and American baseball, respectively.

I have no time for lies and fantasy, and neither should you. Enjoy or die.
-John Lydon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by Buzsaw, posted 03-08-2010 11:04 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 158 by Buzsaw, posted 03-09-2010 11:26 PM ZenMonkey has not replied

  
ZenMonkey
Member (Idle past 4532 days)
Posts: 428
From: Portland, OR USA
Joined: 09-25-2009


Message 182 of 245 (549781)
03-10-2010 7:39 PM
Reply to: Message 181 by AZPaul3
03-10-2010 7:36 PM


Re: Athiestic Values
AZPaul3 writes:
Five times a day, bowing northeast toward England. I use a Second Edition On the Origin of Species as a prayer stone.
Blasphemer! Only the first edition is the One True Word of Darwin (blessings be upon him and all monkeykind).

I have no time for lies and fantasy, and neither should you. Enjoy or die.
-John Lydon

This message is a reply to:
 Message 181 by AZPaul3, posted 03-10-2010 7:36 PM AZPaul3 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 184 by AZPaul3, posted 03-10-2010 8:03 PM ZenMonkey has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024