Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,760 Year: 4,017/9,624 Month: 888/974 Week: 215/286 Day: 22/109 Hour: 3/2


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Big Bang and Cosmology ⇒

Doesn't the distance of stars disprove the young earth theory?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Doesn't the distance of stars disprove the young earth theory?
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005

Normal Thread Display
Message 123 of 138 (593097)
11-24-2010 10:31 AM 		Reply to: Message 121 by TribulationMMA
11-24-2010 7:02 AM

No stars
Just to focus on Cavediver's point.
​
There were no stars right after the big bang. First generation stars could only start to form after at least 400,000 years after the big bang.
​
They kind of had to wait for the universe to cool so that hydrogen could condense and clump up due to gravity to be born.
This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by TribulationMMA, posted 11-24-2010 7:02 AM TribulationMMA has not replied
  
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024