Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,418 Year: 3,675/9,624 Month: 546/974 Week: 159/276 Day: 33/23 Hour: 0/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Doesn't the distance of stars disprove the young earth theory?
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 822 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 17 of 138 (549087)
03-03-2010 10:23 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by Flyer75
03-03-2010 8:56 PM


That's why theistic evolutionists really baffle me. I can understand the atheist more then I can the Christian who feels the need to have science prove "God" and creation.
That's not the position of a Theistic Evolutionist. Only creationists try to use their science-ey type stuff to "prove" god.

"Some people think God is an outsized, light-skinned male with a long white beard, sitting on a throne somewhere up there in the sky, busily tallying the fall of every sparrow. Othersfor example Baruch Spinoza and Albert Einsteinconsidered God to be essentially the sum total of the physical laws which describe the universe. I do not know of any compelling evidence for anthropomorphic patriarchs controlling human destiny from some hidden celestial vantage point, but it would be madness to deny the existence of physical laws."
-Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by Flyer75, posted 03-03-2010 8:56 PM Flyer75 has not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 822 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 37 of 138 (549222)
03-05-2010 12:55 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by RAZD
03-05-2010 12:14 AM


Re: The Fun Part Coming Soon!
Probably filled with made up footage of "views" from the purported satellites that show things according to their false "secular materialistic" agenda, such as showing the earth orbiting the sun.
Don't get SO started again.......

"Some people think God is an outsized, light-skinned male with a long white beard, sitting on a throne somewhere up there in the sky, busily tallying the fall of every sparrow. Othersfor example Baruch Spinoza and Albert Einsteinconsidered God to be essentially the sum total of the physical laws which describe the universe. I do not know of any compelling evidence for anthropomorphic patriarchs controlling human destiny from some hidden celestial vantage point, but it would be madness to deny the existence of physical laws."-Carl Sagan
"On a personal note I think he's the greatest wrestler ever. He's better than Lou Thesz, Gorgeous George -- you name it."-The Hulkster on Nature Boy Ric Flair

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by RAZD, posted 03-05-2010 12:14 AM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 822 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 74 of 138 (573565)
08-11-2010 10:15 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by Nuimshaan
08-11-2010 7:51 PM


Because all stars alive right now are visible from some location in space, whether it's closer or farther away from them....does not age them in any respect.
So....you think you see stars as they are right now? The speed of light, in your opinion, is instantaneous?
But in no sense of physica wil moving faster toward a destination inhibit the progression of time, and cause physics to occur slower in order for the trip to take longer than what actually occurred from the movement of said object from one location to another with a given speed.
Boy, you might want to have a word with Stephen Hawking. Hell, sounds like you could tell quite a few astrophysicists a thing or two. I'd like to see your white paper on the subject since you know so much.
I am fully ready to have my cosmological ass handed to me in the event you actually DO know what the fuck you are talking about because I am but a rookie ass cosmologist.

"A still more glorious dawn awaits
Not a sunrise, but a galaxy rise
A morning filled with 400 billion suns
The rising of the milky way"
-Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Nuimshaan, posted 08-11-2010 7:51 PM Nuimshaan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by Apothecus, posted 08-12-2010 2:35 PM hooah212002 has replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 822 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 77 of 138 (573718)
08-12-2010 2:45 PM
Reply to: Message 76 by Apothecus
08-12-2010 2:35 PM


Forgive me, I was drunk when I wrote that. Looking back, I have no idea why the hell I said what I said.

"A still more glorious dawn awaits
Not a sunrise, but a galaxy rise
A morning filled with 400 billion suns
The rising of the milky way"
-Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 76 by Apothecus, posted 08-12-2010 2:35 PM Apothecus has seen this message but not replied

  
hooah212002
Member (Idle past 822 days)
Posts: 3193
Joined: 08-12-2009


Message 104 of 138 (575085)
08-18-2010 8:47 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by Nuimshaan
08-18-2010 8:35 PM


You admit that though the stars are far away....whereever they are located....they are alive right NOW.
Not technically so. For instance, if we see a star that is 4 billion light years away, we see it as it was 4 billion years ago.
ABE:
I thought this was what you meant when I responded in Message 74. I guess my drunkenness didn't put me too far off base.
Edited by hooah212002, : No reason given.

"A still more glorious dawn awaits
Not a sunrise, but a galaxy rise
A morning filled with 400 billion suns
The rising of the milky way"
-Carl Sagan

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by Nuimshaan, posted 08-18-2010 8:35 PM Nuimshaan has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024