peg writes:
sex outside of the bounds set by religion causes huge problems for society.
...
And on evolution terms, all the problems associated with erratic sexual behavior is detrimental to society rather then beneficial.
Therein lies your problem. Religion assumes that human society is included in the overall plan, and the fact that human urges run contrary to what society expects of us is at the very least unhelpful design.
The evolutionary perspective on the other hand does not have anything *in mind* when it does its thing; even if the rampant sexual exploits of a human cause huge problems for the society, if those problems can be overcome without resulting in the death of the offspring, such traits will tend to proliferate. You are still trying to apply the misguided notion that there is a designing intelligence behind even the evolutionary perspective. The fact is that the organism most fit to reproduce will proliferate directly results in our inherent desire to bonk anything that moves.
peg writes:
sex with muliple partners creates problems with STD's and unwanted pregnancies most often leading to abortion which in turn...
This is ridiculous, so I shall. STDs come with the territory, and with suitable screening they are a small price to pay for access to a wide array of booty. From an evolutionary perspective there *are* no unwanted pregnancies otherwise you would not have hit it in the first place. Besides, you are again assuming that there is some hidden designer that is sitting in our testicles and adjusting the next generation to fit with societal norms. Aborted pregnancies have no affect on evolutionary progression, the sperm don't pull their punches because the previous batch didn't make it.
peg writes:
that is not my view of death. I DO view death as the end of the road and i do NOT believe the bible teach's immortality of the soul. Rather it teaches that " the wages sin pays is death " as opposed to "the gift God gives is everlasting life"
so death and life are opposites according to the bible, death is not moving onto another aspect of life...if that were the case, why would God and Jesus be talking about correcting our situation and giving us eternal 'life'?
So you are either:
A) Asserting that through your belief you will not die. (Boy are you in for a surprise!)
B) Asserting that nobody in the history of the world ever got a payoff from your religion. (Chances don't look good for you, eh?)
or C) Quibbling pointlessly over intentionally twisted semantics.
I am actually leaning toward option B from your post, which is certainly an interesting take on the situation. Not only is your deity fallible but also apparently wholly incapable of rectifying the situation its incompetence caused, and you are depending on the unlikely prospect that it will get its act together during your lifetime as opposed to the thousands of years predating it. God and Jesus are also frikkin' liars since everyone they ever met or preached to ultimately died; the deity and its son never even managed to save one person! Thief on the cross: You are forgiven... but you die anyways!