Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,757 Year: 4,014/9,624 Month: 885/974 Week: 212/286 Day: 19/109 Hour: 2/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Scientific Theory For Dummies
jar
Member (Idle past 420 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 45 of 57 (574604)
08-16-2010 8:25 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by Tram law
08-16-2010 8:20 PM


Because what confuses me is that it sounds like a person is supposed to do anything they can to find out if something is wrong, then if something is wrong then it calls the entire body of work into question.
In science that is pretty much what you try to do. Science advances by finding out what is wrong with current theories, but it usually only refutes one part of the body of work.
The mistake Creationists make is in thinking that proving one theory wrong adds weight to some other theory. Don't work like that.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by Tram law, posted 08-16-2010 8:20 PM Tram law has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 420 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 54 of 57 (574727)
08-17-2010 1:22 PM
Reply to: Message 52 by Tram law
08-17-2010 1:08 PM


You also need to understand falsification.
For example, in your example the hypothesis that "Ivory soap always floats in water" is refuted by just those two examples (or even one example) that sinks.

Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Tram law, posted 08-17-2010 1:08 PM Tram law has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024