The usual creationists attempts to discredit these and similar systems do not address the correlations, and this is where they fail spectacularly. There is no rational reason for all the correlations unless the data is either accurate or ALL illusionary (including that yesterday occurred).
If you want to make the obligatory creationist attempt, I would be happy to answer your posts on one of those threads. Your job is not to whack down a bunch of creationist fallacies, but to address the issue of correlations: why do they occur if the dating systems are invalid? NO creationist has been able to explain this in the 8 years since I posted the first version.
... under a range of sedimentary strata that all have knife edge boundaries in the horizontal plane. My point being that this is typical of rapid deposition. ...
It is actually MORE typical of non-rapid deposition. What rapid deposition would normally look like is one mixed layer (with some grading of particles by size and density). There is NO mechanism to stop and start different layers in creationist rapid deposition models.
Misunderstanding evidence doesn't mean you can debate or disagree on what it means.
... as you are new here, some posting tips:
type [qs]quotes are easy[/qs] and it becomes:
quotes are easy
or type [quote]quotes are easy[/quote] and it becomes:
quote:quotes are easy
also check out (help) links on any formatting questions when in the reply window.
quote:Hello. very interesting subject. But for me probably will be rather difficult. As I in physics am not so strong, but nevertheless there is a wish to understand àðõè. I will explain why. My purpose of visit of this forum was to find the expert who has skills in definition of radio-carbon dating. And this interest is chosen not casually. At some stage I noticed that the radio-carbon method shows not those data. And if to understand in essence that can be found places where cretaceous layers are shifted by the coal. Though by natural definition it is possible to call with confidence 100% cretaceous prime, and then have to be coal. But radio-carbon measurements for any reason show on a turn. Especially as chalk in itself has to stand as the coal which has faded from time. Other aspect. http://fotki.yandex.ru/users/ibr2020-12/view/674138?page=0 To us this photo it is noticed as limestones any breed blocks still. But in my opinion it is sandstone hardened. I approximately calculated as the hardened breeds of sandstones were formed. And for me big surprise began to see and understand that before sandstones were formed there could be still any life on a planet. Moreover and in such quantity. I certainly don't say goodbye but that more while I won't be able to tell about it. After all I couldn't finish the author at all the picture to show on this district.
... But for me probably will be rather difficult. As I in physics am not so strong, but nevertheless there is a wish to understand àðõè. ...
There also appears to be a language barrier, and that your translator to english is imperfect and incomplete.
... My purpose of visit of this forum was to find the expert who has skills in definition of radio-carbon dating. And this interest is chosen not casually. At some stage I noticed that the radio-carbon method shows not those data. And if to understand in essence that can be found places where cretaceous layers are shifted by the coal. ...
The usefulness of 14-C dating is limited to 50,000 years at best. This means that coal and cretaceous layers cannot be dated by this method, as they are too old.
... But radio-carbon measurements for any reason show on a turn. Especially as chalk in itself has to stand as the coal which has faded from time.
This doesn't mean anything in english as translated, sorry.
To us this photo it is noticed as limestones any breed blocks still. But in my opinion it is sandstone hardened. ...
Curiously, your opinion is strangely incapable of changing one type of rock into another. Limestone is determined by the chemical content of the stones, and sandstone is determined by the chemical content of the stones. Sandstone hardened (solidified?) is still sandstone.
Now the dirty translation from English into Russian, you Dear Panda me somewhat rebuked. But that's if you believe the translator. Well actually maybe you I was offered around carefully to understand. But how do I know the true direction of your thoughts? From this conclusion, until we reach the semantic turn in translations of our thoughts, our peoples will never agree with one another. (A) require from me whatever I studied English? Maybe you're right. But if I now follow your advice what should I study languages of all peoples of the world. Not ambiguous, but true. After all, it is my intention to push through his idea at least in one of the many countries of the world. And if you've zaprâgaete in the sense that I have given almost chewed material. And we only have to take a spoonful and swallow it. In addition I must once and bow to you in the legs. If it were in my power I would personally came and bowed to each of you who speaks broken English and language explained the purpose of his visit. But I created a theory which is able to break down the whole sustainable peace science. It's part of dating was the main foundation of all that is wrong with nagromoždeno over the years. Alas I don't what to say. http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/...702.0/0_7ff63_4fac1a22_XXL.jpg
Well, really will there be not a single Russian in all America?
Would not make the slightest difference when you post complete gibberish like this (copy and pasted directly from your own post to which this is a reply):
Maybe if you were to actually post что-нибут по руский, then a Russian would be able to make sense of what you write. But as long as you instead insist on posting complete gibberish (as I had quoted from you above), then this entire world could be completely filled with Russians and still nobody would be able to understand what you write.
Besides, this forum is in English, which means that we post everything in English. Not posting in the standard language of this forum is rude and persistent rudeness will not be received well.
Both things I have told you in this message are very simple and self-evident and should be obvious to anybody capable of thinking. Why are you unable to understand them?
You might try translating the English text back to Russian before posting. If the re-translated Russian text does not make sense, then don't put it on the forum.
Under a government which imprisons any unjustly, the true place for a just man is also in prison. Thoreau: Civil Disobedience (1846)
The apathy of the people is enough to make every statue leap from its pedestal and hasten the resurrection of the dead. William Lloyd Garrison.
If there is no struggle, there is no progress. Those who profess to favor freedom, and deprecate agitation, are men who want crops without plowing up the ground, they want rain without thunder and lightning. Frederick Douglass
They are not well translated. So as we say in Russia "horseradish radish is sweeter" your writing I have to scroll down just a few translators. One's lying in one place the other in another. But if I do not understand it Paul woes. But if my text on there dropped comma, or something like that. Not the word. What is your impression on so many iskazâtsâ that you are not nice to doslušivat′ until the end. And I'm a man of his word. And if my word is distorted for me it will be a big hit. Yes, and it is not the most important thing. Chief is still the truth. And it is worth more than any words. For me now the main thing that you have learned only one thing. From chalk and coal is split by time which depends at what point the water filled up one or the other pools. The crust broke dropping the level of the oceans. Will be a time of course everything will fall into place. And apparently still do not need to send an expedition that would check all my arguments. But my point should be understood today. And from this point to begin a new reference point. And further on is the cause and effect of the Pacific, Atlantic, Indian, and others. Will talk about the Mariana hollow. And what are the Northern lowlands. It's all Dells are alternately water swamped during the lifetime of an evolutionary world. http://img-fotki.yandex.ru/...702.0/0_80014_3e86bb80_XXL.jpg
Created a translation http://translate.google.co.uk/?hl=en&tab=wT#ru/en/ Determine the difference. They all do not translate well. So as we say in Russia, "Horseradish is not sweeter than" your text once I scroll through a few translators. One lies in the same place in each other. But if I do not understand it's even half woes. But if in my text on the back dropped comma, or something like that. Not the word. What are your impressions on so much to distort that you will not be pleased doslushivat through. And I'm a man of the word. And if my word is distorted for me it will be a big blow. And it's not the main thing. Mostly still is truth. And it is more than words. For me now the main thing that you understand only one thing. Of chalk and charcoal is time sharing which depends on at what point the water fills one or the other pools. The crust cracked lowering the level of the oceans. The time will surely everything will fall into place. And apparently still need to send more than one expedition that would check all of my arguments. But my idea is to be understood today. And from this moment to begin a new point of reference. And then it will cause and consequence for the Pacific Atlantic, Indian, and others. We will talk about the Mariana Trench. And for what are the northern lowlands. Dell is all that alternately flooded with water in the course of evolutionary time of the planet.