1- What is your level of skepticism ? (I gotta say mine is extremely high)
Good.
You know, when I was 20, I actually thought this might be true. Back in 1994. People gave me all sorts of circumstantial details about how
last year a dedicated team of archaeologist had found the Ark and how
next year the people who found the Ark would come back with actual
evidence.
But the thing is that this idea has hung about the evangelical community for year after year. We're always
just about to learn that there is real solid evidence for the Ark. It has been ... kind of ... discovered ... and they're going to produce the real actual proof ...
next year.
And the first news source that you cite has this to say: "
There have been several reported discoveries of the remains of Noah's Ark over the years, most notably a find by archaeologist Ron Wyatt in 1987."
When I was 13.
Now I just want to shout: "
Show us the frickin' Ark!"
2- If it really turns out to be what they say it is, what are the implications ?
Well, if someone actually found some structure that they could verify really
was Noah's Ark, then the implications would be huge.
But I'm not holding my breath.
---
The survival of the Ark is not even implied by scripture. If you believe the Bible, it was a structure
built out of wood, made
four thousand years ago, and designed to last for
about a year, and then
lodged on a mountain, rather than, for example, in a peat-bog. Even if every word of the Book of Genesis was true, I wouldn't expect a 4000-year old wooden artifact to survive in those conditions. Yet curiously enough, people keep on discovering it. Well ...
kinda discovering it. But not
really discovering it.