Should we teach both evolution and religion in school?

How is that consistent with centuries of observation that life can and does change over time? Species have long been observed to change significantly over time. That change occurs because some individuals are "more affected" by their genes, in terms of their survival, than "someone else's." That produces a change in species because species are made up of the individuals of that species. And 2000 years ago "Christianity" was about carpentry. I think it's fair to demand that participants grapple with arguments as they're being made now, don't you think? The study of evolution, particularly in microbiology, is responsible for great advances in water purification and antibiotics.Evolution solves problems in biology, it doesn't prevent their solution. That is what creationism does, however, by obstructing a true and unprejudiced view of the natural world that surrounds us. Your own inability to understand even the simplest biological concept (such as "species") is ample evidence of the obscuring power of creationist propaganda.

Because they're lied to about it, by you and "Erich von Frange"?

Why do you trust "Erich von Frange"? Be specific.

Most of us are pretty sure you'll tell any lie you need to tell to argue with us, and I think you pretty much just confirmed it. The fact that you accuse us all of lying to you pretty much proves it; projection is the sign of a guilt conscience.Edited by crashfrog, : No reason given.

Sure there is.It is to do the experiment, which is constructed in such a way that the experiment has only two outcomes, one of which is possible only under microevolution.If that's the outcome you get, then the experiment proves the existence of microevolution. It's actually quite simple.