Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 68 (9078 total)
140 online now:
DrJones*, dwise1, nwr, Tanypteryx (4 members, 136 visitors)
Newest Member: harveyspecter
Post Volume: Total: 895,003 Year: 6,115/6,534 Month: 308/650 Week: 78/278 Day: 0/26 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Should we teach both evolution and religion in school?
saab93f
Member (Idle past 706 days)
Posts: 265
From: Finland
Joined: 12-17-2009


Message 173 of 2059 (664117)
05-29-2012 3:21 AM
Reply to: Message 147 by OpticalIllusions
04-16-2012 7:36 AM


quote:
I'm not a religous zealot, I don't think religion should be taught in the science class (but creation science should). Of course religion would only be taught in literature, philosophy, art, and music, since religion basically creationed those subjects. You can't teach art without the Sistine Chapel.

There is no such thing as creation science. Those two words are totally incompatible.

In my country kids are taught their religion in school. The unbelievers study philosophy. There´s been a lot of discussion in here whether teaching religion should be stopped and replaced with something akin to comparative religions studies.

I´m a bit torn - OTOH it would be better than the current system but then again it would be so nice if there were no religions...and thus no need to spend time in teaching and studying those. In reality it is wise to know a thing or two about every religion so that when you encounter a person you don´t deliberately insult them

Edited by saab93f, : Typo


This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by OpticalIllusions, posted 04-16-2012 7:36 AM OpticalIllusions has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by kofh2u, posted 08-24-2012 10:23 AM saab93f has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022