Should we teach both evolution and religion in school?

Faith, the simple fact is that the God you try to market was doubly wrong, both versions of a flood She included in the Bible never happened.You just need to get used to the fact that the God you market is a dolt and ignoramus.

But God said there were two entirely different Biblical Floods that were mutually exclusive, or haven't you ever read the Bible?Which account of the Biblical Flood is true and which is just a lie?

Only an utter fool would accept that "a" is "a" on faith.The teacher would explain the reason "a" is "a" and frankly, it is so simple even a Creationist might be able to understand."a" is "a" by definition. If we are going to communicate we will need some common language and in the language we use in this country "a" is "a".That is not true though in all countries or all languages as you will learn when you are older.

IIRC there has been some results lately of dating metals by separating out some of the carbon in steels (particularly old spear heads and knives) and then dating the carbon.The big limitations as expected is that the carbon must be from the same age as the artifact and the incorporation of fossil fuels like coal or coke will make the object date older than it is.I still strongly doubt that he had any coin dated.Edited by jar, : fix link

I doubt that even more than your penny story.By the way, the Australian penny was 97%copper, 2.5%zinc and 0.5% tin which makes your story even less plausible.

While the Good Lord may well have put limits on how smart a person can be, it seems there is no limit on dumb.

Particularly since there is no carbon in an Australian penny.From Message 583:

quote:

---

By the way, the Australian penny was 97%copper, 2.5%zinc and 0.5% tin which makes your story even less plausible.

---

Of course not and to even think that is true is simply an indicator that the person who holds such beliefs is willfully ignorant at best, possible just delusional and more likely simply a liar or conman.Many religious folk understand the earth is at least 4 billion years old, modern man appeared at least 50,000 years ago and that we are simply the result of evolution. More utter bullshit. Science evolves through independent thought and to deny that is simply at best a case of willful ignorance although it could possibly be delusion. Most likely it is simply lying or an attempted con job.

One might also ask where the carbon14 and carbon12 came from since the Australian penny is 97%copper, 2.5%zinc and 0.5% tin.

You just seem determined to show your ignorance, don't you.I am religious and believe in God but also understand that we are simply evolved critters, that neither of the mutually exclusive Biblical Floods ever happened, that the earth is at least 4 billion years old and that you are simply full of shit, spouting nonsense and hell bent on convincing everyone that you are willfully ignorant or a liar.

Well no, they do not have any evidence against evolution.Sorry but them's the facts. Well fortunately no one says that, Creationists are willfully ignorant or lying or delusional. Of course any Creation scientists are simply lying.

There is absolute evidence for evolution.There is zero evidence of any designer and certainly not an intelligent designer.

Well if you are talking about the Bible then it is certainly not 3000 years old and most certainly has much in it that is factually wrong. It's not a matter of which version or any churches practices, it is that the words written are often contradictory, mutually exclusive and factually wrong.Sorry but them's the facts. Again, you are simply showing your ignorance of scripture and the Bible.Satan was not involved in self worship, rather the issue was that He refused to bow down and worship humans as beings higher than angels.

Yet you offer no evidence or even reasoning to support your assertions.Why should anyone take you seriously about anything?

Add in Biblical Christianity.There is absolutely no concept of honesty in Biblical Christianity, fundamentalism or creationism and there is a basic dishonesty inherent in all three.The problem is that they are taught to trust the Source instead of testing the Content. The are educated by platitudes, through "truths"."If you don't stand for something you will fall for anything."The pastor, brother, bishop, preacher prances across the stage and presents them with "truths".Therein lies the problem. Once they accept that they are given "truths" there is no hope of ever finding truth.They are not taught to test and challenge and criticize the "truths". They are told "There are no contradictions in the Bible and it is the inerrant word of God" but they don't put their hands up and tell the pastor, preacher, brother, bishop "Woah there. Just a cotton picking moment. Are two fowl and seven fowl the same number of fowl?"They are not taught to test whether what they are being sold is actually based on reality or is it just a con job? They listen to sermons; they do not question sermons.If God says it is right then it is right. If Satan says it then it is wrong. They never look at the actual content to see which is right and which is wrong.