Should we teach both evolution and religion in school?

And you think that complaining about it here at EvC is going change things for you?You've published your math and your laments to your community and they didn't care.Why should we?

You're making that quite obvious.

Thank you for the promotion. Now back to the subject at hand. Message 1491If your own colleagues don't care what you think what makes you think we should?

You've been gone a while, Straggler.Welcome back.

You're talking a Philosophy of Education and since I choose to not believe in philosophy your question has no meaning.Well, that was easy. I can see a lot of HS seniors not believing in calculus that final year.

Oh, that's easy.They're thinking, Just placate this science devil so he’ll go away and not see me using this same lie to flimflam this crowd of rubes here. There’s still plenty of suckers to con once he’s out of earshot.

The stupid is strong with this one.Evidence for evolution (article) | Khan AcademyFive Proofs of Evolution | Evolution FAQ Evidence of Evolution - Species, Similar, Organisms, and Evolutionary - JRank Articles What Evidence Supports the Theory of Evolution? - dummiesDarwin's Theory of Evolution: Definition & Evidence | Live ScienceIf you want more evidenced explanations of evolution, let me know. There are, literally, thousands of these.

So more than 200 years of observation and study by thousands of very smart people is all wrong because why? Because you say so?Is this going to be like the tree ring thing where you have no evidence of all this wrongness either? Yeah, we're not supposed to throw bare links out there but your deficiencies are just so broad and deep.You were the one who said the existence of birds, mammals, reptiles etc. is a complete scientific mystery with no evidenced explanation. Those links are just a few of the evidenced explanations you seemed to have missed in your education on evolution.You’re going to have go self-taught on this subject since I am not, and I doubt anyone else on this forum is, inclined to give you a couple semesters of basic evolutionary theory over an internet forum.You're not that important and I'm too fuckin lazy.

So back to PaulK's question.Where did these birds, reptiles, mammals and fish come from if they didn't evolve from other forms?Edited by AZPaul3, : No reason given.

Yes, you have and all of your colleagues have ignored you. Why?Such a fantastic revelation as you think you provide that could revolutionize entire fields of study remains unrecognized, discarded, by the thousands of really smart people whose life's work is to study and master this stuff. Why?There is an answer to these questions.We've seen this kind of phenomenon here before. In other forums we have seen this same phenomenon in the field of physics. The one lone genius who holds the key to overthrowing general relativity or evolution. I imagine such haunts every field.You're a crack pot, Kleinmen, to be ignored hoping you'll go away.Edited by AZPaul3, : No reason given.

The rest of the discipline doesn't believe you. Another crack in the pot there Kleinman.

Apparently neither do you.

Yes, I know. You're one of those that slipped through.Problems with peer review | The BMJ

I don't need to publish. Everyone, but you apparently, already knows that a single SNP at the right place in the right gene which can occur at anytime in any lineage and ... presto chango ... a beneficial mutation has been made.Everyone, but you apparently, knows that in the human genome on this planet about 26 million mutations entered into the genome today ... today.Most of them are neutral. Most of the deleterious mutations never got born and don't count. That leaves a lot beneficial mutations entering the gene pool every day.Wait ... beneficial mutations every day? But Kleinman math says that's impossible!Well, someone is wrong somewhere. I wonder who.

I don't think he understands that when math and observation clash it is the math that is wrong.