Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 64 (9072 total)
604 online now:
AZPaul3, dwise1, kjsimons, PaulK, ramoss (5 members, 599 visitors)
Newest Member: FossilDiscovery
Happy Birthday: Percy
Post Volume: Total: 893,121 Year: 4,233/6,534 Month: 447/900 Week: 153/150 Day: 7/16 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is body hair a functionless vestige?
ZenMonkey
Member (Idle past 3742 days)
Posts: 428
From: Portland, OR USA
Joined: 09-25-2009


Message 84 of 143 (611598)
04-08-2011 10:47 PM
Reply to: Message 83 by Robert Byers
04-08-2011 9:10 PM


Robert Byers writes:

In fact i would say its logical that women have greater hair on the head relative to their body size because they need to keep the head dryer because of lesser body heat. Wet hair threatens them more then big guys. Now perhaps again its useless but it might be usefull.

More head hair for women is good because they have less body mass and more hair keeps them warmer. More head hair for women is bad because it retains more water and makes them colder.

I see.


I have no time for lies and fantasy, and neither should you. Enjoy or die.
-John Lydon

What's the difference between a conspiracy theorist and a new puppy? The puppy eventually grows up and quits whining.
-Steven Dutch

I never meant to say that the Conservatives are generally stupid. I meant to say that stupid people are generally Conservative. I believe that is so obviously and universally admitted a principle that I hardly think any gentleman will deny it. - John Stuart Mill


This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by Robert Byers, posted 04-08-2011 9:10 PM Robert Byers has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by Robert Byers, posted 04-09-2011 12:21 AM ZenMonkey has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022