Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 86 (8998 total)
61 online now:
Hyroglyphx (1 member, 60 visitors)
Newest Member: Juvenissun
Post Volume: Total: 879,510 Year: 11,258/23,288 Month: 510/1,763 Week: 149/328 Day: 64/22 Hour: 0/2

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Silly Design Institute: Let's discuss BOTH sides of the Design Controversy...
Member (Idle past 3669 days)
Posts: 64
Joined: 08-07-2009

Message 121 of 219 (530036)
10-11-2009 11:59 PM
Reply to: Message 118 by Buzsaw
10-11-2009 11:27 PM

Re: Creationist Side Of Silly Design
I don't think it's fair to classify intelligent design with astrology. That's as illogical as classifying a Model T Ford with a 2009 Cadilac.

Well, Astrology DOES have a lot more going for it than ID does.

After all, it can tell a LOT about HOW it has to occur: not effective before birth; directional from certain solar system bodies; influences from different bodies being qualitatively distinct from one another; such influences combinatorial in that influences from different celestial bodies amplify, modify, nullify one another depending on positions relative to each other and relative to the background star field; and more.

Maybe someday the Model T Ford of ID will catch up and figure out how/when/where design is supposed to have been applied.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by Buzsaw, posted 10-11-2009 11:27 PM Buzsaw has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020