Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 89 (8993 total)
82 online now:
Aussie, Diomedes, dwise1, PaulK, Sarah Bellum, Tangle (6 members, 76 visitors)
Newest Member: Juvenissun
Post Volume: Total: 879,100 Year: 10,848/23,288 Month: 100/1,763 Week: 67/390 Day: 20/30 Hour: 3/5

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Silly Design Institute: Let's discuss BOTH sides of the Design Controversy...
Fiver
Junior Member (Idle past 3541 days)
Posts: 26
From: Provo, UT
Joined: 04-17-2010


Message 165 of 219 (565639)
06-18-2010 2:51 PM
Reply to: Message 164 by RAZD
06-16-2010 8:54 PM


And don't forget, of course...
There are a large number of scientific groups who have published statements saying that they disapprove of Intelligent Design Theory.

Obviously this should be considered support for Silly Design Theory.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 164 by RAZD, posted 06-16-2010 8:54 PM RAZD has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 166 by RAZD, posted 06-18-2010 10:28 PM Fiver has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020