Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9077 total)
81 online now:
DrJones*, dwise1 (2 members, 79 visitors)
Newest Member: Contrarian
Post Volume: Total: 894,036 Year: 5,148/6,534 Month: 568/794 Week: 59/135 Day: 5/6 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Why would an intelligent designer design these?
gnojek
Inactive Member


Message 38 of 108 (214817)
06-06-2005 7:05 PM
Reply to: Message 29 by crashfrog
06-06-2005 5:44 PM


Your theory is just as good as mine.

Maybe it is, maybe it isn't. My theory - that is, evolution, which isn't of course "my" theory in any sense that I came up with it - not only explains all the data, but it makes predictions which have been tested and found accurate. It provides a way to make sense of populations and predict how they'll respond to changes in their environment.

I'd just like to add that what I bolded in Crashfrog's post is what a THEORY should do. If it does not do these things then it is not a theory.

This is why creationism and ID are NOT THEORIES.
They don't fit natural explanations to data and they don't make predictions.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 29 by crashfrog, posted 06-06-2005 5:44 PM crashfrog has taken no action

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022