Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
11 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,465 Year: 3,722/9,624 Month: 593/974 Week: 206/276 Day: 46/34 Hour: 2/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Effective Posting Styles (And Suggested Improvements)
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 49 of 89 (648900)
01-19-2012 9:54 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by Trixie
01-19-2012 8:41 AM


Re: Charming....
Now all we gotta do is find out why the USA is so very different from the other countries in the survey.
My guess?
Parochialism.
We all enjoy the joke about American's not being able to find Iraq on a map of Iraq and my guess is that they are unto the medievil European peasent; having no idea about how the wider world works.
/sweeping statement.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Trixie, posted 01-19-2012 8:41 AM Trixie has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by hooah212002, posted 01-19-2012 9:59 AM Larni has not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


Message 52 of 89 (648903)
01-19-2012 10:02 AM
Reply to: Message 44 by hooah212002
01-19-2012 8:23 AM


Re: Charming....
I just absolutely do not feel in the slightest that religion should, any longer, be given the free social pass that it has.
I agree and I started a thread on it (before your time) Why should religion get a free pass?. I totally feel the same way as you do.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Well, Larni, let's say I much better know what I don't want to say than how exactly say what I do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by hooah212002, posted 01-19-2012 8:23 AM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
Larni
Member
Posts: 4000
From: Liverpool
Joined: 09-16-2005


(1)
Message 68 of 89 (649192)
01-21-2012 11:45 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by Buzsaw
01-20-2012 9:05 PM


A call to lurkers.
Objective people, having read and assembled all of the evidence Buz has cited for the Biblical record would know why they support Buz.
If you can find one lurker who agrees with you I will fly to the US and spend the day helping you down tread the various social groups you disapprove of.

The above ontological example models the zero premise to BB theory. It does so by applying the relative uniformity assumption that the alleged zero event eventually ontologically progressed from the compressed alleged sub-microscopic chaos to bloom/expand into all of the present observable order, more than it models the Biblical record evidence for the existence of Jehovah, the maximal Biblical god designer.
-Attributed to Buzsaw Message 53
The explain to them any scientific investigation that explains the existence of things qualifies as science and as an explanation
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 286
Does a query (thats a question Stile) that uses this physical reality, to look for an answer to its existence and properties become theoretical, considering its deductive conclusions are based against objective verifiable realities.
-Attributed to Dawn Bertot Message 134

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Buzsaw, posted 01-20-2012 9:05 PM Buzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Huntard, posted 01-21-2012 2:06 PM Larni has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024