I'm not sure where you got the idea that a hypothesis must be falsifiable to be a valid scientific hypothesis
It's from Karl Popper. It's a cornerstone of the philosophy of science.
- the concept isn't even falsifiable itself and is thus contradictory. I've posted on this previously.
It's a statement about the philosophy of science. It is not a scientific hypothesis. There is nothing contradictory here.
And, really, if you think about it, it's quite obvious. If a hypothesis isn't falsifiable then
nothing is evidence for it. Really. Whatever experiment you do, whatever answer you get, the result is always the same: compatible with the hypothesis. This means no experiment, and no answer, can ever distinguish between the hypothesis being correct, or incorrect. That means that no experiment, and no answer, is ever evidence for it.
Edited by Mr Jack, : No reason given.