Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,425 Year: 3,682/9,624 Month: 553/974 Week: 166/276 Day: 6/34 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Biological classification vs 'Kind'
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 756 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 158 of 385 (563389)
06-04-2010 5:21 PM
Reply to: Message 156 by BobTHJ
06-04-2010 5:05 PM


Re: Getting down to details
if clear evidence were shown for common ancestry between chimps and humans - but the evidence for this (at present) is far from conclusive.
It's a conclusive as evidence gets in science. It's as sure as the notion that the planets in our solar system travel in ellipses around the barycenter of the whole mess, down close to the Sun.
OT for this thread, perhaps? Shall I start a new one?

"The wretched world lies now under the tyranny of foolishness; things are believed by Christians of such absurdity as no one ever could aforetime induce the heathen to believe." - Agobard of Lyons, ca. 830 AD

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by BobTHJ, posted 06-04-2010 5:05 PM BobTHJ has seen this message but not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 756 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 159 of 385 (563390)
06-04-2010 5:28 PM
Reply to: Message 156 by BobTHJ
06-04-2010 5:05 PM


Re: Getting down to details
"transitional forms demonstrating common ancestry between humans and chimpanzees will not be found".
You're a couple decades late on this one, Bob. Ardipithecus? Orrorin? Sahelanthropus?
We've got the fossils, Bob.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by BobTHJ, posted 06-04-2010 5:05 PM BobTHJ has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 210 by BobTHJ, posted 06-07-2010 5:25 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 756 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 261 of 385 (564686)
06-11-2010 6:10 PM
Reply to: Message 259 by BobTHJ
06-11-2010 5:23 PM


Baranomes, huh? Really?
When was the last time you used your vomeronasal organ, Bob? I'll bet it's been a while. Your VNO is a pair of little blind-ended tubes that you might have in the septum of your nose. Maybe half of adult humans do have one. Human fetuses have them in their palate, and have a structure in their brain called an Accessory Olfactory Bulb that's attached to the VNO with nerves. But, by around the time we're born, we resorb the AOB, the VNO either migrates higher up into the nose or disappears, and the nerves go away.
New World monkeys, lemurs, and many other mammals have VNOs in their palates that are connected to AOBs, and they use them to sniff out girl/boy friends that are in the mood to mate. You may have seen a bull curl up his upper lip near a heifer's rear end - he's trying to get a whiff of her "scent" to his VNO to see if she's in heat.
Oddly enough, though, great apes have no functional VNO. What they can have is a little blind tube in the septum of their nose, with no nerve connected to their AOB, because they resorbed their AOB while still a fetus. Like humans. Unlike New World monkeys or lemurs.
Old world monkeys have varying degrees of development of VNO.
Can you suggest a creationist scenario where this makes even a particle of sense? I can draw a family tree with lemurs, OW monkeys, NW monkeys, and great apes (including humans) where it makes very good sense. I can even offer a plausible scenario to explain why we don't have VNOs. I don't think creationism can do either.

"The wretched world lies now under the tyranny of foolishness; things are believed by Christians of such absurdity as no one ever could aforetime induce the heathen to believe." - Agobard of Lyons, ca. 830 AD

This message is a reply to:
 Message 259 by BobTHJ, posted 06-11-2010 5:23 PM BobTHJ has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 302 by BobTHJ, posted 06-14-2010 7:05 PM Coragyps has replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 756 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 269 of 385 (564759)
06-12-2010 10:33 AM
Reply to: Message 263 by Wounded King
06-11-2010 6:36 PM


The lack of understanding of baranomes recently led to a severe misinterpretation of the origin of genes in the secular literature.
There's the paydirt for this whole discussion - that word "secular." Borger tips his hand there - the same hand that the whole creationist crowd is holding - that "secular" literature = bad and religious apologetics = good. And that they only engage in the latter.

"The wretched world lies now under the tyranny of foolishness; things are believed by Christians of such absurdity as no one ever could aforetime induce the heathen to believe." - Agobard of Lyons, ca. 830 AD

This message is a reply to:
 Message 263 by Wounded King, posted 06-11-2010 6:36 PM Wounded King has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 756 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 308 of 385 (565199)
06-15-2010 1:10 PM
Reply to: Message 302 by BobTHJ
06-14-2010 7:05 PM


Easily. In the creationist model the baranomes have decayed over time (via mutation and information lost via natural selection due to speciation). It is not at all unlikely that one or more parts of the human body are no longer functional due to loss of information. I'll even go so far as to predict that more presently functioning organs will become non-functioning in the future. Creation is doomed to a bitter end (well, without supernatural intervention anyway).
So can I take this to mean that gorillas, chimps, and humans are more sinful, or at least groan more under the weight of sin, than tarsiers or New World monkeys? And why take away our VNOs and AOBs in the same way in humans and in the other great apes?
And I ask again: when, Bob, did you last use your vomeronasal organ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 302 by BobTHJ, posted 06-14-2010 7:05 PM BobTHJ has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 335 by BobTHJ, posted 06-16-2010 3:22 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 756 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 318 of 385 (565297)
06-15-2010 10:01 PM
Reply to: Message 317 by BobTHJ
06-15-2010 9:50 PM


was referring to abiogenesis - a distinctly atheistic belief -
Huh? God isn't smart enough to use carbonyl sulfide to make polypeptides from the amino acids that He made in the solar nebula?
If you think a moment, you will likely come to the realization that once there was no life on this planet. Now there is. Abiogenesis is "life from no life," specifically, cellular/protocellular/viral life. So you theists are stuck with abiogenesis, unless your Creator was of one of those forms.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 317 by BobTHJ, posted 06-15-2010 9:50 PM BobTHJ has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 339 by BobTHJ, posted 06-16-2010 4:26 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 756 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 379 of 385 (567378)
06-30-2010 10:02 PM
Reply to: Message 368 by BobTHJ
06-29-2010 7:32 PM


The science as a whole would also be falsified if humans and chimps (or some other primate) were shown to have common ancestry.
Then consider "baraminology" as falsified as phrenology, because chimps and humans do share common ancestry, as shown by about 417 lines of evidence that I'm aware of. Go read message 261, this thread, again, and explain to be once more why these "baranomes" related to vomeronasal organs "deteriorated" in the same exact way in great apes and in humans, but not in monkeys or lemurs.

"The wretched world lies now under the tyranny of foolishness; things are believed by Christians of such absurdity as no one ever could aforetime induce the heathen to believe." - Agobard of Lyons, ca. 830 AD

This message is a reply to:
 Message 368 by BobTHJ, posted 06-29-2010 7:32 PM BobTHJ has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 380 by Coyote, posted 06-30-2010 11:53 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024