Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 85 (8937 total)
32 online now:
kjsimons, PaulK (2 members, 30 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: ssope
Post Volume: Total: 861,827 Year: 16,863/19,786 Month: 988/2,598 Week: 234/251 Day: 5/58 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Opening the doors to creationism in British Schools?
Panda
Member (Idle past 1971 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


(1)
Message 27 of 129 (618601)
06-04-2011 7:46 AM
Reply to: Message 24 by Robert Byers
06-04-2011 4:49 AM


Robert Byers writes:

One could almost say most science classes are history classes...

Robert Byers writes:

Science class in fact has no right to talk about [past and gone events].


You appear to be contradicting yourself within the same post.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Robert Byers, posted 06-04-2011 4:49 AM Robert Byers has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by Robert Byers, posted 06-08-2011 12:52 AM Panda has responded

Panda
Member (Idle past 1971 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 32 of 129 (619090)
06-08-2011 8:26 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by Robert Byers
06-08-2011 12:52 AM


Robert Byers writes:

Panda writes:

Robert Byers writes:

One could almost say most science classes are history classes...

Robert Byers writes:

Science class in fact has no right to talk about [past and gone events].


You appear to be contradicting yourself within the same post.

Nope. both statements were the same species.


You think that these two statements used to be able to produce viable offspring but can no longer do so?

Edited by Panda, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by Robert Byers, posted 06-08-2011 12:52 AM Robert Byers has not yet responded

Panda
Member (Idle past 1971 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 95 of 129 (624737)
07-19-2011 5:46 PM
Reply to: Message 93 by IamJoseph
07-19-2011 9:26 AM


IamJoseph writes:

Genesis is saying humans are unique as the only life form requiring clothing.


Do not take your clothes off or YOU WILL DIE!!

If god had meant us to be naked, then we would have been born naked!!


This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by IamJoseph, posted 07-19-2011 9:26 AM IamJoseph has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 98 by IamJoseph, posted 07-20-2011 4:20 AM Panda has responded

Panda
Member (Idle past 1971 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 100 of 129 (624805)
07-20-2011 5:33 AM
Reply to: Message 98 by IamJoseph
07-20-2011 4:20 AM


IamJoseph writes:

Its not a Walt Disney story - we are told with manifest evidence one life forms is unique - it alone requires clothing - told with the ushering in of the life forms.


So, you continue to make bare assertions with no evidence to back them up.

People do not require clothing.
Many people have spent their whole (long) lives naked.
I could spend my whole life living in Antarctica completely naked.

You just make crap up as you go along, don't you.

Edited by Panda, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 98 by IamJoseph, posted 07-20-2011 4:20 AM IamJoseph has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 101 by IamJoseph, posted 07-20-2011 5:42 AM Panda has responded

Panda
Member (Idle past 1971 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 102 of 129 (624809)
07-20-2011 5:46 AM
Reply to: Message 101 by IamJoseph
07-20-2011 5:42 AM


IamJoseph writes:

as it turns out the manifest facts are on Genesis' side, people DO require clothing


Prove it.
You made the original claim - prove it.

I have lived in Iceland without clothing. Explain how.
People have lived in Africa without clothing. Explain how.
Take off your clothes and explain why you do not die.

Edited by Panda, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 101 by IamJoseph, posted 07-20-2011 5:42 AM IamJoseph has not yet responded

Panda
Member (Idle past 1971 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 104 of 129 (624840)
07-20-2011 9:32 AM
Reply to: Message 103 by hooah212002
07-20-2011 9:22 AM


hooah212002 writes:

Homo-sapiens require three things and three things only: air, water and nourishment; everything else is luxury.


I think the saying goes thus:

3 minutes without air.
3 days without water.
3 weeks without food.
3 months without underwear.

Edited by Panda, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 103 by hooah212002, posted 07-20-2011 9:22 AM hooah212002 has acknowledged this reply

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by IamJoseph, posted 07-22-2011 10:49 PM Panda has responded

Panda
Member (Idle past 1971 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 109 of 129 (625455)
07-23-2011 7:52 AM
Reply to: Message 107 by IamJoseph
07-22-2011 10:49 PM


IamJoseph writes:

Yes we can intentionally choose not to breathe - but for how long?


We can intentionally choose to not wear clothing.
For how long? For our whole long lives.

We do not need clothing.
Your statement is false.

Edited by Panda, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by IamJoseph, posted 07-22-2011 10:49 PM IamJoseph has not yet responded

Panda
Member (Idle past 1971 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 113 of 129 (625545)
07-23-2011 10:07 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by IamJoseph
07-23-2011 8:28 PM


IamJoseph writes:

But only humans are seen with this need


No, humans are not seen with a need for clothes.

I have asked several times and you seem unable to answer it, so I will repeat it:
I have lived in Iceland without clothes. Why am I still alive? Or did I not need clothes?


This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by IamJoseph, posted 07-23-2011 8:28 PM IamJoseph has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 114 by IamJoseph, posted 07-23-2011 10:38 PM Panda has responded
 Message 115 by Granny Magda, posted 07-23-2011 11:44 PM Panda has responded

Panda
Member (Idle past 1971 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 116 of 129 (625555)
07-23-2011 11:45 PM
Reply to: Message 114 by IamJoseph
07-23-2011 10:38 PM


Seriously?
IamJoseph writes:

Pandas of iceland don't need clothes. Only humans do.


So, you finally agree with me.
Humans don't need clothing.
Why didn't you just say sooner and save us all a lot of time.

Or is there some other reason you refuse to answer such a simple question?

Edited by Panda, : No reason given.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 114 by IamJoseph, posted 07-23-2011 10:38 PM IamJoseph has not yet responded

Panda
Member (Idle past 1971 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 117 of 129 (625556)
07-23-2011 11:46 PM
Reply to: Message 115 by Granny Magda
07-23-2011 11:44 PM


Granny Magda writes:

You have to admit, he's got you there.


Us pesky pandas and our broadband connections and our computers...

It is a shame the IamJoseph has to be such a moron when failing to support his arguments.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by Granny Magda, posted 07-23-2011 11:44 PM Granny Magda has not yet responded

Panda
Member (Idle past 1971 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 125 of 129 (625610)
07-24-2011 12:56 PM
Reply to: Message 124 by Larni
07-24-2011 11:17 AM


Re: World of his own.
Larni writes:

What the fucking hell are you talking about?


Is there a name for the mental condition where someone thinks that what they are typing makes sense, but it in fact makes no sense at all?
(And I guess it is cognitive dissonance that prevents them from hearing people's criticisms.)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by Larni, posted 07-24-2011 11:17 AM Larni has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by Larni, posted 07-24-2011 2:02 PM Panda has responded

Panda
Member (Idle past 1971 days)
Posts: 2688
From: UK
Joined: 10-04-2010


Message 127 of 129 (625616)
07-24-2011 2:11 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by Larni
07-24-2011 2:02 PM


Re: World of his own.
Larni writes:

Best I can identify, and I would feel confident to rule out the negative symptoms of schizophrenia (at least) is that IAJ is a twat.


I would go with Dawn Bertot simply being a twat, but IamJoseph seems genuine in his madness.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by Larni, posted 07-24-2011 2:02 PM Larni has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by Larni, posted 07-24-2011 3:59 PM Panda has acknowledged this reply

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2019