Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 0/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is personal faith a debatable topic?
onifre
Member (Idle past 2977 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 49 of 85 (563398)
06-04-2010 5:54 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by hooah212002
06-02-2010 4:45 AM


My 2 cents
is it possible to successfully and honestly debate someones faith when it so obviously intermingles with matters that can be proven via evidence?
You can debate them as honestly as you want, but as long as they don't see your evidence as "evidence," it will not be successful. This is where I'm in agreement with what CS is saying. Teach them to think logically and use reasoning, like I do with my kids, and if they're smart enough they'll reach the same conclusions as science and value empirical evidence.
Look at Buz. He doesn't believe there is evidence for the BB because he has a totally screwed up concept and understanding of the BB. He literally doesn't believe the concept he himself invented. And he's so fucked up in his other beliefs that he can't even realize that.
Why would ANYONE waste time with him, or anyone that thinks like that? ICANT is the same way. But most here do so in an honest fashion, yet it is almost never successful.
How would one go about doing this when the other party simply refuses to accept any science that goes against their belief system?
You can't. And it's not that you shouldn't because it's not acceptable to do so, you shouldn't because it's a waste of time.
One main thing to remember is that their beliefs and your scientific evidence wouldn't change their lives at all. They'll just say, "Oh, that's how the sun formed" or, "Ok, now I understand how organisms evolve. Thanks." But that's about it. So what would be their reason for giving in to your argument and seeing it your way? To let you win? People are stubborn, they'd rather live with their ignorance than ever admit being wrong.
I think that's what faith is, never being able to admit that you're just fucking wrong!
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by hooah212002, posted 06-02-2010 4:45 AM hooah212002 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 50 by hooah212002, posted 06-04-2010 6:29 PM onifre has replied
 Message 51 by Rahvin, posted 06-04-2010 8:03 PM onifre has replied
 Message 53 by Buzsaw, posted 06-04-2010 11:35 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2977 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 56 of 85 (563464)
06-05-2010 1:51 AM
Reply to: Message 51 by Rahvin
06-04-2010 8:03 PM


Re: My 2 cents
But the debates bring out people like Son Goku and cavediver, who are pretty damned good at translating physics and math into layman-speak without becoming as uselessly inaccurate and sensationalist as your typical science magazine
That's a fair point but it only seems relevant in a debate forum like this one. I don't think Hooah would have the ability to reference guys like cave and son to his sister in law.
For the purpose of this forum and those of us who enjoy learning from these guys, it's great to debate the likes of Buz and ICANT. I have, like you , learned a lot. But if a result is what Hooah is looking for I think he won't get it from the sis in law.
While there's very little to gain in terms of "winning a debate" with ICANT et al, I still think there's plenty of reason to take the time to engage them.
Absolutely. And I'll continue to do so. Sometimes what I think is the right answer turns out to be wrong, and in steps someone like cave or Wounded King and sets me straight. That's why I usually respond anyway, cause I'm close to the right answer I just need a better explanation.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Rahvin, posted 06-04-2010 8:03 PM Rahvin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by hooah212002, posted 06-05-2010 2:25 AM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2977 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 57 of 85 (563465)
06-05-2010 1:58 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by Buzsaw
06-04-2010 11:35 PM


Re: My 2 cents
We don't buy it.
You are in no position to "buy it"or not. You don't know more than those who study these subjects for a living and contribute to the advancement of science. So you should feel privileged to learn from them and stifle yourself.
Of course you people are stubborn as well.
What do you mean by, You people?!
Scientist are stubborn? Is that what you're saying? That they don't study the evidence properly? Cause that's where I get my answers from. I highly doubt the entire world community of scientist is in some kind of conspiracy to reject creationism... and I love conspiracies! This is just too far fetched.
So in my view, it follows that the best answers we can get come from the fields of science, right? Why would I value any other source?
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by Buzsaw, posted 06-04-2010 11:35 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2977 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 61 of 85 (563604)
06-06-2010 3:14 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by hooah212002
06-05-2010 2:25 AM


Re: My 2 cents
EX-girlfriend's friend. Emphasis on the EX.
I knew it wasn't sis in law but I was to lazy to check. Sorry dude. EX, very EX, got it. lol
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by hooah212002, posted 06-05-2010 2:25 AM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2977 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 62 of 85 (563605)
06-06-2010 3:20 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by Buzsaw
06-05-2010 11:18 PM


Re: Testable Evidence.
We both have an unproven thesis premise, yours being the alleged singularity, having no space to have happened in, no time in which to have happened, no outside of into which to expand, and no model
This, again, is not the correct model for the BB. What you have presented are BOTH your theories. One is creationism, the other is YOUR strawman version of the BB.
But you don't get that do you? You actually think you understand the BB model and have exposed it's fallacies, right?
This is my point hooah. Even if you get your EX to listen to some science, she will find away to misunderstand it and claim it has fallacies just like creationism. At that point it becomes pointless to argue with them IMO.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by Buzsaw, posted 06-05-2010 11:18 PM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by Buzsaw, posted 06-10-2010 7:37 AM onifre has not replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2977 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 70 of 85 (564004)
06-07-2010 6:05 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by hooah212002
06-04-2010 6:29 PM


Re: My 2 cents
But is it not acceptable to do so? I mean as a non-believer, is it a faux-pas?
A faux-pas? lol. What is this Sex and the City and you just wore white after spring?
I don't think it's not acceptable to do so, but it would depend on what the person you're attempting to debate feels about that. As a general rule? Well I don't think there is one, I think that's one we can make up for ourselves.
I personally feel that anything is open for debate. It's the only way we can progress. And I do debate religion, so I'm following through.
Some people feel you can't because it is a sacred belief that shouldn't be questioned. But personally I feel that's bullshit. It has perhaps been the tradition, but we can change that.
I think that's the way to go about it. Debate the dogmas and tenets of the religions, then hopefully people won't rest their beliefs on 2000 year old books and get caught up with the rest of the intellectual society.
Or are you saying it isn't worth it due to the fact that they accept the shit on faith, so therefor are very very unlikely to even listen to the other side?
I don't know what the figures are on that but I'd say that most people of faith who have ignored scientific inquiry in their personal lives, yet pursued a religious education on blind faith, have a very good chance of not being interested in the actual science.
I hate to keep bringing Buz up but: Take his interpretation of the BB, it is absolutely wrong and yet he feels he has learned the science but he just doesn't "buy it." Someone like that is just being ignorant and perhaps doesn't want to learn the actual science because it may further expose their beliefs as false.
But if you find someone who you show the science to and they find it at least curious, maybe, just maybe they'll try to learn it properly.
I see what you mean. However, in my particular case, the life I am concerned with is my son's. The indvidual I had the discussion with is my son's babysitter (my ex has custody). I could give a shit if I change their life, I just want to at least pass on knowledge. If I can get one person to stop and think "hmm, maybe this whole science thing isn't so bad after all", I think my immediate world will be better off.
I see. Yeah I feel you. In my life my ex-wife is Christian, my kids were raised going to church, Sunday school and praying. But, I love science and exposed them to that. Took them to museums, bought them books (kids LOVE dinosaurs), took them to the planetarium, did science projects with them, explain the BB to them, how galaxies and planets and stars formed, how organisms evolved, etc... And now they love it, because one thing we'll have on our side, as long as we expose kids to it is, church is boring and science is COOL!
Planetarium -vs- Church? Get the fuck outta here, hands down, planetarium wins. Kids don't want to be in church, the only thing that keeps them there is fear. Make sure YOU explain to your son that he doesn't need to feel that fear. He'll listen, kids are smart, they can see through adult bullshit. Just actively play a role in exposing him to good science.
Currently my kids are 13 and 11 and neither of them believes anything about god, or at least that's the impression I get. My 13 year old has openly claimed to be atheist. The younger one hasn't said anything but she is the one that's more into science than the older one. She loves biology and astronomy. If anything, she may have a deist approach to the question of god, or perhaps agnostic.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by hooah212002, posted 06-04-2010 6:29 PM hooah212002 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Straggler, posted 06-07-2010 8:49 PM onifre has not replied
 Message 73 by hooah212002, posted 06-09-2010 6:32 PM onifre has replied

  
onifre
Member (Idle past 2977 days)
Posts: 4854
From: Dark Side of the Moon
Joined: 02-20-2008


Message 74 of 85 (564313)
06-09-2010 7:17 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by hooah212002
06-09-2010 6:32 PM


Re: My 2 cents
Yep. I'm wearing a dress as we speak. My boss is less than thrilled, to say the least.
Send me some pics you sex thang. LOl
Yea, my oldest boy is about to leave for his mom's in NY for the summer (I have primary placement for him) and I am going to surprise him and his brother when he comes back with a microscope and a telescope. Maybe I might even send it to him out there.
There are lots of cool science things to experience in NY. I'll be there next week, and I can't wait to hit the museums.
Other than that, I think my questions have been addressed sufficiently. Thanks all for your input.
Dude, any time, contact me, private if you want. I've been through divorce, kids, and dealing with their separation, any time you need some help and/or advice hit me up. Seriously bro, I'll try to help.
- Oni

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by hooah212002, posted 06-09-2010 6:32 PM hooah212002 has seen this message but not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024