Buzsaw writes:
What proof do you have, as an archeologist who researches observable evidence, that something expanding existed having no space in which to exist, no time in which to have happened and no outside of into which to expand when, in fact, upon such a premise you base your thesis/argument and upon which thesis premise you interpret everything you observe, or is such a belief not subject to disproof by scientific evidence?
Oh for fuck's sake Buz! He has NONE, since that is not his field of study. And as long as you keep misrepresenting the big bang theory, no evidence will be found, because, guess what,
that's not what that theory says! He also did not base his interpretations on that premise, the big bang theory is irrelevant when it comes to archaeology, and a whole lot of other sciences as well.
Sheesh!
™ Version 4.2
