Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,419 Year: 3,676/9,624 Month: 547/974 Week: 160/276 Day: 0/34 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Assessing the Radioisotopes and the Age of the Earth (RATE) Project
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3664 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 33 of 36 (565254)
06-15-2010 5:24 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by Jzyehoshua
06-14-2010 6:33 PM


Re: Another gross mistake
I have brought up this same reservation dozens of times on similar forums before, and have yet to receive a solid answer on the subject of why half-lives can't decay faster. Perhaps I don't understand it, which is why I will keep making the point until I see evidence to the contrary.
Simple - nuclear decay rate depends upon the physics of the nucleus, which is governed by the strong and weak nuclear forces. The energy scale of these forces is way above that of electromagnetism, that governs the atomic and chemical interactions. Thus, pressure, temperature, electricity, magnetism, etc cannot affect nuclear decay rates unless these reach the energy scale of the nuclear forces (which can occur in relativistic matter, such as in neutron stars and collapsars heading towards black holes.)
The other possibility is to vary the nuclear forces themselves. However, this will not only change decay rates, but destablise otherwise stable nuclei. There is no evidence of this ever happening. On the contrary, evidence from Oklo and other natural nuclear reactors, and from supernovae explosions, demonstrate that nuclear decay rates have been constant over the past several billion years...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by Jzyehoshua, posted 06-14-2010 6:33 PM Jzyehoshua has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Taq, posted 06-15-2010 5:45 PM cavediver has replied
 Message 36 by RAZD, posted 06-15-2010 9:32 PM cavediver has not replied

  
cavediver
Member (Idle past 3664 days)
Posts: 4129
From: UK
Joined: 06-16-2005


Message 35 of 36 (565269)
06-15-2010 6:15 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Taq
06-15-2010 5:45 PM


Re: Another gross mistake
And to add to this...
Remember that a nuclear explosion is but a momentary fleeting venture into the lowest reaches of the energy scale we are discussing...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Taq, posted 06-15-2010 5:45 PM Taq has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024