Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,799 Year: 4,056/9,624 Month: 927/974 Week: 254/286 Day: 15/46 Hour: 1/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Convergent Evolution - Reasonable conclusion? or convenient excuse?
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 62 of 107 (565380)
06-16-2010 1:17 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by BobTHJ
06-16-2010 1:02 PM


BobTHJ writes:
95%+ of organisms fit nicely into a nested hierarchy. However, the hierarchy can not fully model that last <5% because there will be shared features/genes with other not closely grouped organisms.
Can you provide an example or two of organisms in this last 5%?
I already provided one. Bats and dolphins.
That bats and dolphins both emply echo-location does not break the model of a nested hierarchy.
A nested hierarchy does not imply that there will not be shared features between the nests.
Like, bugs and birds both have wings but they're not nested together. Or do you think that breaks the model too?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by BobTHJ, posted 06-16-2010 1:02 PM BobTHJ has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024