Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
7 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,776 Year: 4,033/9,624 Month: 904/974 Week: 231/286 Day: 38/109 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Professional Debate: Scientific Evidence for/against Evolution… “Any Takers?”
IamJoseph
Member (Idle past 3694 days)
Posts: 2822
Joined: 06-30-2007


Message 120 of 196 (625250)
07-21-2011 11:28 PM
Reply to: Message 117 by Mazzy
07-21-2011 4:18 PM


Re: This whole thread has been silly
quote:
The simple reference to neo-Darwinism as opposed to Darwinism is one small demonstration of the theory of evolution being a theory in evolution itself with little, if any, predictive ability past hindsight.
I have tracked every sub-set factor of Darwinism to Genesis' first chapter, including assumptions of cross-speiciation. The categorising of speicies [kinds/Genesis] is wholly subject to the seed chip transmission of the host, a directive program within what has been found as dna and genes, etc, and able to produce the same replication with an extra random X factor of individuality, and continue the process of repro.
Darwin added nothing new other than observing how a car works and shouting Eureka! No car maker! Since then, ToE has embellished a host of novel fantastical improvisations as props, but when closely examined are not based on any sciences. Evolution was introduced in Genesis, in its correct protocol as an after the fact process.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by Mazzy, posted 07-21-2011 4:18 PM Mazzy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024