Note I did not say power was "equal to" heat.
I said power can be "thought of"[Actually it was: "can also be viewed as"] as heat which your equation and this example illustrates well.
You also said:
The equations are presented clearly for anyone knowledgeable to verify whether your persistent criticisms are correct.
But I can't find any math symbol for "can be viewed as", so what equations are you referring to? May I suggest the Japanese for eye,目? Now we can write H=Pt; read, Heat is equal to Power multiplied by time. Or our new math, P目H; read, Power can also be viewed as Heat. Then we can extend this new math. Since Vt=d, then, V目d; read Velocity can also be viewed as distance. Would it be presumptuous of me to suggest that as Ad
-1∝D
-1, read, An apple a day is inversely proportional to doctors, then, D
-1目A; read, A doctor standing on her head can also be viewed as an apple?
I'm out.
Firstly, have you any experience in promoting professional debates? All I see is you making one erroneous statement after the next, and fallacies of consequence?
Passive aggressive appeal to emotion much?
With your use of this kind of tactic I can't trust that this is not anything more than a ploy. On what forum will you be announcing that you challenged anyone on EvC to debate "neo-darwinism" away from their home turf and none would take you up on it?
Secondly, I am in no way qualified for the job. I can distinguish reason from idiocy, but that's about it. That's what makes me qualified to argue P目H.
Thirdly, I've a boat to catch.
But I wish you luck.
Edited by lyx2no, : Dropped a predicate adjective.
"Mom! Ban Ki-moon made a non-binding resolution at me." Mohmoud Ahmadinejad
™ Version 4.2
