Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,745 Year: 4,002/9,624 Month: 873/974 Week: 200/286 Day: 7/109 Hour: 3/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Professional Debate: Scientific Evidence for/against Evolution… “Any Takers?”
pfrankinstein
Junior Member (Idle past 4472 days)
Posts: 5
Joined: 03-12-2011


Message 102 of 196 (609873)
03-23-2011 11:03 PM


Richard Dawkins writes:
It is absolutely safe to say that, if you meet somebody who claims not to believe in evolution, that person is ignorant, stupid or insane (or wicked, but I'd rather not consider that).
Natural selection allowed cognitive selection to emerge.
Cognitive selection has applications outside and beyond that of just biology.
Science itself and the gathering of knowledge "evolves" by descent with modification and by means of cognitive selection.
It is a fact that we pass on down through generations more than just our genes.
The process of science evolving and the process of Darwinian/biological evolution are both related, both types of ''evolution'' operating on different levels.
Natural selection, nature doing the choosing is largely unconscious subconscious.
Cognitive selection, consciously choosing.
So. If 'Cognitive selection' is related to 'Natural selection' and selection itself moves, advances, evolves then IMO Darwinian/biological evolution = fact. [albeit through the sidedoor.]
Paul.
If the bb started a single process, and that single process = "evolution" then "selection" has moved from the non-conscious to the unconscious, subconscious, conscious state.
Edited by pfrankinstein, : + some.
Edited by pfrankinstein, : No reason given.

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024