peter borger
Member (Idle past 7692 days) Posts: 965 From: australia Joined: 07-05-2002
|
|
Message 62 of 150 (13396)
07-12-2002 2:53 AM
|
Reply to: Message 12 by Peter
06-14-2002 3:59 PM
|
|
Dear Peter
Maybe if one could proof that randomness is not involved we might speak of design?
Peter
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 12 by Peter, posted 06-14-2002 3:59 PM | | Peter has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 63 by Peter, posted 07-15-2002 8:43 AM | | peter borger has replied |
|
peter borger
Member (Idle past 7692 days) Posts: 965 From: australia Joined: 07-05-2002
|
|
|
Message 64 of 150 (13738)
07-17-2002 8:49 PM
|
Reply to: Message 63 by Peter
07-15-2002 8:43 AM
|
|
Dear Peter
I am not going to discuss a theory that lacks a proper foundation. I proved that NDT can be falsified and it is up to you what you are going to do with that. You are free to integrate nonrandomness somewhere in your theory. For me the theory has not gained in credulity, just the opposite. Mend the theory and I will falsify it via the backdoor. Why? Because it is a bad theory, nothing but a meme. I know that NDT has fallen beyond repair. The only thing you can do now is introduce lots of assumptions, and I think Mark24 wouldn't agree to that because he is wielding Occam's razor.
Best Wishes
Peter
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 63 by Peter, posted 07-15-2002 8:43 AM | | Peter has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 68 by Peter, posted 07-19-2002 3:41 AM | | peter borger has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2