havoc writes:
Dembski does make some really stupid statements doesn't he.
What are the odds of lightning striking a particular leaf in a field?
This would be explaind by Dembskis Law filter. The nature of lightning would cause it to strike somewhere. There is nothing intrinsic in DNA that causes it to code for one thing over the other. To take your analogy further you should look for lighting to repeatedly strike a corn field in a way that leaves a picture of Darwin scorched in the field. Then you would have a point.
Too funny.
Guess what, we don't see the picture drawn by lightning and we don't see DNA coding for some pre-determined output either.
Neat isn't it.
Anyone so limited that they can only spell a word one way is severely handicapped!
™ Version 4.2