Understanding through Discussion

Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 81 (9005 total)
42 online now:
Pollux, ramoss, Tangle, Taq (4 members, 38 visitors)
Newest Member: kanthesh
Post Volume: Total: 881,189 Year: 12,937/23,288 Month: 662/1,527 Week: 101/240 Day: 29/35 Hour: 0/0

Announcements: Topic abandonment warning (read and/or suffer the consequences)

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Genesis 1 vs. Genesis 2
Member (Idle past 2818 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007

Message 270 of 295 (582378)
09-21-2010 1:12 AM
Reply to: Message 264 by NOMA&NOPAAKAAN ORPHAN
09-20-2010 10:34 PM

Re: Redactor
ind you it must be said that given the OP is an irrational argement it will not be possible for this in suppport of it to provide rational arguemnetation will it?

Might I ask, why is the OP irrational? The topic is rational, the post is rational and he asks for rational comments. Simply whether Gen1 and Gen2 are contradictory with evidence to back up the position. nHow is this irrational.


Its time to get real in this thread, someone needs to prove that the OP says what it say IE that G1 and G2 contradict themselves when they IN ACTUAL FACT DO NOT!!

makes a point, but where is your evidence? If they do not, you should be able to show they do not, otherwise your statement is irrational.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002

Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969

Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 264 by NOMA&NOPAAKAAN ORPHAN, posted 09-20-2010 10:34 PM NOMA&NOPAAKAAN ORPHAN has not yet responded

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2018 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2020