Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Genesis 1 vs. Genesis 2
III
Junior Member (Idle past 4664 days)
Posts: 18
Joined: 09-02-2010


Message 146 of 295 (578901)
09-02-2010 11:57 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by hepteract
06-25-2010 2:48 PM


Interpreting
hepteract,
You're going to find that for each individual, typically, there is a different interpretation of G1 and G2 even from a atheistic interpretation . If you are interested in learning about those interpretations you should search the internet. FYI: There is nothing in G1 or G2 that can be interpreted to the affect that they're in fact infallible documents, that decision is typically made by a church administration or individual. Since there is thousands of churches and billions of belief's, it is arguable weather or not G1 and G2 are in fact scriptures to be interpreted as infallible. I've seen everything from interpreters reading Genesis 1-2:3 to be a different creation account than Genesis 2:4-25 to them being interpreted as Genesis 1-2:3 to be a thought/spiritual creation/preparation and Genesis 2:4-25 being the real creation.
Edited by Dr.Whisky, : I corrected some errors.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by hepteract, posted 06-25-2010 2:48 PM hepteract has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by purpledawn, posted 09-03-2010 8:21 AM III has replied

III
Junior Member (Idle past 4664 days)
Posts: 18
Joined: 09-02-2010


Message 148 of 295 (579207)
09-03-2010 8:08 PM
Reply to: Message 147 by purpledawn
09-03-2010 8:21 AM


Re: Interpreting
purpledawn,
My side of the argument is above.
Thanks for the welcome!
Edited by The Saint, : I edited my name from Dr.Whiskey to "The Saint".
Edited by III, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 147 by purpledawn, posted 09-03-2010 8:21 AM purpledawn has not replied

III
Junior Member (Idle past 4664 days)
Posts: 18
Joined: 09-02-2010


Message 150 of 295 (579412)
09-04-2010 2:24 PM
Reply to: Message 118 by Coragyps
08-26-2010 3:57 PM


Re: Chronology
Coragyps,
The fossil record is evidence of evolution but it is also evidence of creation. Evidence is to be interpreted by interpreters. I will admit that the more interpreters of this case, the better the overall interpretation. However, I don't think even if the entire world thought that life as we know it was created through strictly random processes, which is not the case, that it would mean in fact life as we know it randomly evolved.
Edited by Dr.Whisky, : context meaning of last sentence
Edited by Dr.Whisky, : Removed last sentence. I also corrected some errors. FYI: I realized this post is a little off topic. Sorry.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 118 by Coragyps, posted 08-26-2010 3:57 PM Coragyps has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024