Unless I was there when God created the world with a video camera, I doubt whether we can provide any evidence that will convince anyone who doesn't want to believe. there are only arguments from analogy, but they can be accepted or dismissed in want of better evidence.
there is no more evidence for the metaphysical religion of evolution, but its adherents claim it is empirical science so feel as they dwell in a more intellectual arena. they also claim to have enough evidence, that faith is not even required. I could provide many quotes from evolutionary scientists that would demonstrate that this is far from a universal consensus in the scientific community but i will just give you one for now.
It was David Hull, a well-known philosopher of science, who wrote as early as 1965 that ". . . science is not as empirical as many scientists seem to think it is. Unobserved and even unobservable entities play an important part in it. Science is not just the making of observations: it is the making of inferences on the basis of observations within the framework of a theory."