I like quoting these fella's cos you should be putting up a united front but at unguarded moments these things slip out.
Who cares if we have a unified front or not?
For that matter, shouldn't creationists put a little effort into unifying their "front" if that's so important? If so, then why are there so many competing creationist organizations? Why can't Kent Hovind get along with Answers in Genesis? Why are there so many Christian churches that each insist that their "literal" but different interpretation of the Bible is accurate and all others are wrong?
If Creationism is so true, as I imagine that you feel it is, why can't creationists agree with each other? Why is it such a splintered movement?
And for that matter, why aren't you reading the things you post? The quote you posted says that the fossil record is entirely consistent with evolution - and that there's more evidence for evolution than just the fossil record. I don't see how you think that helps your case, or what you think he's saying in an "unguarded" moment. Sounds like he's saying there's way more evidence for evolution than just the fossil record. Why do you think that helps your position?