Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,470 Year: 3,727/9,624 Month: 598/974 Week: 211/276 Day: 51/34 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Did Mod cause the collapse of evcforum?
DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3797 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 262 of 424 (567637)
07-02-2010 3:07 AM
Reply to: Message 190 by Hyroglyphx
06-30-2010 12:24 PM


Re: Jackass Perspective
quote:
If I was an incredibly disingenuous and despicable person, I probably wouldn't have told the forum who I was.
Sure, like the thief who is so impressed with their handiwork, they beg to be caught, so their brilliance might be vindicated.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by Hyroglyphx, posted 06-30-2010 12:24 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 268 by Hyroglyphx, posted 07-02-2010 8:39 AM DBlevins has replied

  
DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3797 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 286 of 424 (567755)
07-02-2010 1:09 PM
Reply to: Message 268 by Hyroglyphx
07-02-2010 8:39 AM


Re: Jackass Perspective
Sorry if you mistake my meaning. I don't mean to say you are particularily brilliant, or that you are not. I only wished to point out that you when you 'outed' yourself, you seemed pleased with your duplicity and surprised that others could not see past your mask.
The fact that you 'hid' behind another name, whether you thought anyone with half a brain should have recognized your 'clues', is what I was calling - disingenuous. I understand why you weren't telling people who you were. Regardless, you were not being candid about who you were.
As far as hiding online is concerned, it isn't too hard to do so when most users are not in the habit of digging through every reference you make about the past to deduce who you might be.
Finally, I don't want to derail this thread and certainly don't want you to feel I have any animosity toward you. Congratulations on your current open-mindedness, which I have always felt this board was about.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 268 by Hyroglyphx, posted 07-02-2010 8:39 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 288 by Hyroglyphx, posted 07-02-2010 1:38 PM DBlevins has not replied

  
DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3797 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 312 of 424 (567848)
07-02-2010 6:23 PM
Reply to: Message 277 by Hyroglyphx
07-02-2010 10:50 AM


Re: What is the conclusion (Part B)?
Not to confuse the issue of incest but it also depends on your culture, what would constitute incest.
For example: In the Hawaiian system of kinship, what you would consider to be your cousin, would be considered your brother/sister, and I think considered to fall under the incest taboo.
In other kinship systems, it is considered acceptable and maybe even desirable to marry your cross-cousin.
Even though many in western culture describe the offspring of their mother or fathers siblings as cousins and not brother or sister, there can be a stigma associated with such a pairing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 277 by Hyroglyphx, posted 07-02-2010 10:50 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 315 by Hyroglyphx, posted 07-02-2010 6:43 PM DBlevins has replied

  
DBlevins
Member (Idle past 3797 days)
Posts: 652
From: Puyallup, WA.
Joined: 02-04-2003


Message 316 of 424 (567858)
07-02-2010 7:22 PM
Reply to: Message 315 by Hyroglyphx
07-02-2010 6:43 PM


Re: What is the conclusion (Part B)?
I was talking about siblings above the age of consent.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 315 by Hyroglyphx, posted 07-02-2010 6:43 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024